Teams

PC-Tumlin

2025 Ann · Gadsden

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Gadsden have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Butch Barker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.62
Butch Barker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Craig Tumlin
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.45
Craig Tumlin
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.35
David Weir
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.33
Ronnie McFarling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.28
Cary Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Darryl Hardy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Andy Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.14
Charlie Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
John J Moore
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Kevin Meacham
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 41% · published
LaMont Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Dobbs
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Tumlin + Cary Stokes4260% gamesnot enough data
Charlie Rogers + Cary Stokes2442% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tumlin + David Weir4167% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tumlin + Michael Dobbs404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Dobbs + Andy Hamilton224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Dobbs + David Weir123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Dobbs + John J Moore033 matchesnot enough data
David Weir + Cary Stokes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Butch Barker
30W–26L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Butch Barker
30W–26L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Craig Tumlin
36W–24L career · 32 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Craig Tumlin
36W–24L career · 32 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
David Weir
18W–13L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Ronnie McFarling
36W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cary Stokes
15W–13L career · 12 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Darryl Hardy
14W–16L career · 12 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Andy Hamilton
23W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.16
3.5
Charlie Rogers
21W–21L career · 12 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
John J Moore
26W–15L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Meacham
5W–30L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
LaMont Stokes
9W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Dobbs
12W–23L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.