Teams

Muncy/DV/Foothills

2023 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 55 & over · 8.0 Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-29vs Womack/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Sheryl Horine / David Sprague vs Robert Womack / Karen Tonks6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Almond / Stefan Frisch vs Connie Kleeves / Mike Kleeves7-5, 7-5
2023-07-29vs Womack/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Almond / David Sprague vs Karen Tonks / Robert Womack6-1, 6-2
2023-07-15vs Womack/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Sheryl Horine / David Sprague vs Connie Kleeves / Mike Kleeves6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Almond / Stefan Frisch vs William Lewis / Marian Erikson7-6, 6-2
2023-07-15vs Womack/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Almond / David Sprague vs William Lewis / Karen Tonks6-0, 6-1
2023-07-01vs Womack/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Almond / David Sprague vs William Lewis / Cori Thompson6-0, 6-4
2023-06-17vs Womack/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Sprague / Carol Almond vs William Lewis / Lynne Place6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLarry Gouldthorpe / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Robert Womack / Karen Tonks6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-10vs Womack/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Sheryl Horine / David Sprague vs Robert Womack / Cori Thompson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Almond / Stefan Frisch vs Connie Kleeves / Mike Kleeves6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Mary Sheryl Horine
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
David Sprague
published 4
3.85
Carol Almond
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.83
Pam Muncy
published
3.67
Jeanne Ann Lewis
published
3.57
Logan Freeman
published
3.27
Bo Lewis
published 3.5
3.18
Stefan Frisch
published
Larry Gouldthorpe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Sheryl Horine
71W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
David Sprague
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Carol Almond
117W–59L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Pam Muncy
31W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Jeanne Ann Lewis
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Logan Freeman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Bo Lewis
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Stefan Frisch
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Larry Gouldthorpe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.