Teams

HDaly (PCC)

2023 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-28vs FHaselden/KSummers (Palisades)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLacey Johnson Boatman / Cassandra Greco vs Karen Davies / Mildred Hurd6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoan Bullard / Kim Wachtel vs Freida Haselden / Joanne Ward6-4, 6-4
2023-09-21vs FHaselden/KSummers (Palisades)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Dolan / Cassandra Greco vs Karen Davies / Penelope Powell6-1, 6-1
2023-09-14vs FHaselden/KSummers (Palisades)Won 21
W#1 DoublesPenny Hill / Cassandra Greco vs Karen Davies / Debbie Wilson7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLacey Johnson Boatman / Kim Garner vs Freida Haselden / Penelope Powell6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoan Bullard / Brenda Kirkpatrick vs Joanne Ward / Claire Buie2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-08-24vs FHaselden/KSummers (Palisades)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJean Kreisher / Kim Garner vs Lisa Gregoire / Laura Hatfield4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-17vs FHaselden/KSummers (Palisades)Won 20
W#1 DoublesPenny Hill / Cassandra Greco vs Lisa Gregoire / Cindy Harty6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHelen Daly / Lacey Johnson Boatman vs Virginia Borkey / Mildred Hurd6-0, 6-1
2023-08-10vs FHaselden/KSummers (Palisades)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJean Kreisher / Cassandra Greco vs Debbie Wilson / Laura Hatfield1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Joan Bullard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Sharon Dolan
published
3.11
Elizabeth Rudder
published
3.06
Cassandra Greco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Lacey Johnson Boatman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Jean Kreisher
published
2.82
Sylvia Walker
published
2.78
Kim Garner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Elizabeth Suppa
published
Helen Daly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cassandra Greco + Lacey Johnson Boatman2445% gamesnot enough data
Joan Bullard + Cassandra Greco044 matchesnot enough data
Cassandra Greco + Kim Garner123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Rudder + Lacey Johnson Boatman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joan Bullard
30W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Dolan
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Rudder
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Cassandra Greco
66W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Lacey Johnson Boatman
30W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.97
Jean Kreisher
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
Sylvia Walker
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Kim Garner
43W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Elizabeth Suppa
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Helen Daly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.