Teams

Koeberl/Dalmau-Sunset Queen Bees

2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Grainne Koeberl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Adela Dalmau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Melissa Tom
published 3
2.68
Jeane Anastas
published 3
Results6 ties
2025-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrainne Koeberl / Denise Butchee vs Jing Liu / Lina Gao6-2, 6-4
2025-07-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKalpana Berman / Grainne Koeberl vs Autumn Bunch / Tricia Wimmer6-3, 6-4
2025-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Tom / Adela Dalmau vs Christin Harrington / Jane Nearn6-1, 6-1
2025-06-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdela Dalmau / Melissa Tom vs Abigail Cupper / Grayson Dempsey6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGrainne Koeberl / Melissa Tom vs Abigail Cupper / Grayson Dempsey7-5, 7-6
2025-06-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdela Dalmau / Grainne Koeberl vs Ashley Sajadi / SHAWNA THOMPSON6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Grainne Koeberl
56W–66L career
0%93%7%
2.94
3
Adela Dalmau
11W–46L career
not enough data
3
Melissa Tom
39W–38L career
2%98%0%
2.73
3
Jeane Anastas
14W–31L career
4%96%0%
2.68

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.