Teams

Break Point Tennis

2026 Tri-Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-19vs Sportsplex TouchLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandi Falcone / Ellen Robertson vs Carolyn Pinheiro / Deirdre Gaspari6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Balachova / Haley Springston vs Margaret Pedziwiatr / Judy Godfrey1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-12vs Southern: WTLOVLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Robertson / Shikha Raturi vs Victoria Madonna / Pearllan Mary Cipriano1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Piehler / Lyla Arenfeld vs Martha Little / Corinna Geib3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHaley Springston / Rachel Doriss vs Gabrielle Melton / Lucy Drotning2-6, 3-6
2026-03-29vs PTC Slice GirlsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrandi Falcone / Ellen Robertson vs Laureen Cantwell / Gillian Cobb6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKasey Reynolds / Andrea Piehler vs Jane Fisher / Alison Spear4-6, 4-6
2026-03-22vs Taconic Tri BreakersLost 01
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Balachova / Jelena Skoro vs Melanie Redl / Vicki Batten3-6, 6-7
2026-03-15vs Solo Women's 4.0 TrilevelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrandi Falcone / Ellen Robertson vs Karen Rossi / Margaret Coughlan6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Piehler / Haley Springston vs Shellie Malachi / Tiffany Christopher0-6, 1-6
2026-03-08vs Taconic-McLeod/JarvisWon 20
W#1 DoublesEllen Robertson / Brandi Falcone vs Danielle Franzella / Kimberly Lee6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElisabeth Balachova / Lyla Arenfeld vs Annabelle Curcio / Kelly Curran6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesEllen Robertson / Lynn Grady vs Lucy Burnes / Heidi DeSiena6-3, 7-5
2026-02-01vs Southern: WTLOVSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynn Grady / Ellen Robertson vs Melissa Bamford / Danielle Cawood6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Balachova / Andrea Piehler vs Corinna Geib / Callan Young0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Ellen Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Lynn Grady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Brandi Falcone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Shikha Raturi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.26
Laurie Hedlund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Lyla Arenfeld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Andrea Piehler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Rachel Golden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Kasey Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Anna Greig
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Bridget Fraser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Elisabeth Balachova
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Jelena Skoro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Haley Springston
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.63
Elizabeth Reichheld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Catalina Torres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Lauren Rich
published
2.21
Rachel Doriss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eva Lopez-Salinero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kasey Reynolds + Lyla Arenfeld6069% games+14.9% vs expected
Anna Greig + Bridget Fraser5178% games+12.3% vs expected
Ellen Robertson + Brandi Falcone12461% games+3.2% vs expected
Shikha Raturi + Brandi Falcone14758% games+1.5% vs expected
Ellen Robertson + Shikha Raturi6849% games−5.2% vs expected
Eva Lopez-Salinero + Elizabeth Reichheld044 matchesnot enough data
Kasey Reynolds + Jelena Skoro303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Robertson
129W–60L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Lynn Grady
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Brandi Falcone
173W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Shikha Raturi
91W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Laurie Hedlund
11W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Lyla Arenfeld
27W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Andrea Piehler
112W–150L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Rachel Golden
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kasey Reynolds
29W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Anna Greig
14W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Bridget Fraser
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Elisabeth Balachova
41W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Jelena Skoro
29W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Haley Springston
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.65
Elizabeth Reichheld
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Catalina Torres
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Lauren Rich
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Rachel Doriss
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Eva Lopez-Salinero
13W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.