Teams

Kaye/Broome/Nashville

2022 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-19vs Dennis/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarcella Tudeen / Elizabeth Ward vs Melinda Senna / Angie Wesley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-18vs Patterson/Conlon/NashvilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarcella Tudeen / Elizabeth Ward vs Erin Cabell / Cara Keith6-1, 6-2
2022-03-29vs Wells/NashvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Desiree Appleby vs Mary Powers / Melinda Stone6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-22vs Perry/NashvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesDesiree Appleby / Elizabeth Ward vs Corinne Perry / Julia Pomeroy6-3, 6-2
2022-03-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesMary Craft / Elizabeth Ward vs Sharon Sanders / Luann Lavin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
3.38
Sunyoung Fitt
published
3.25
Jinna Harmon
published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Sara Cook
published
3.19
Marcella Tudeen
published
3.18
Susan Lahey
published
3.11
Desiree Appleby
published 3.5
3.04
Kristi Broome
published
2.95
Elizabeth Ward
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Brenda Peterson
published 3.5
2.85
Mary Craft
published
2.82
Heidi Kaye
published 3.5
Linh Burnett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Lahey + Rebecca Sara Cook2642% games+1.7% vs expected
Linh Burnett + Kristi Broome5446% games−5.6% vs expected
Sunyoung Fitt + Susan Lahey3249% gamesnot enough data
Marcella Tudeen + Elizabeth Ward314 matchesnot enough data
Marcella Tudeen + Sunyoung Fitt303 matchesnot enough data
Marcella Tudeen + Susan Lahey123 matchesnot enough data
Sunyoung Fitt + Rebecca Sara Cook213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Rudolph
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Sunyoung Fitt
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Jinna Harmon
19W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Rebecca Sara Cook
23W–27L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Marcella Tudeen
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Susan Lahey
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Desiree Appleby
11W–24L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kristi Broome
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Elizabeth Ward
110W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
3.5
Brenda Peterson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Mary Craft
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3.5
Heidi Kaye
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.82
Linh Burnett
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.