Teams

GR RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-02vs CCC REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesFenny Evers / Michelle Windemuller vs Lori Manzer / Lisa Banks7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTaylor Carney vs Christie Heller6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Killion / Philippa Biggi vs Beth Pestotnik / Kelley Wood2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEMILY JENNINGS vs Robyn Moore3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Hoppe / Sue Carmody vs Karen Myles / Trina Jablonsky6-1, 6-1
2022-05-26vs MC YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesAna Cruz / Leann Koontz vs Dana Stehno / Julie Gall3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesFenny Evers vs Molly Balmes1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSue Carmody / Philippa Biggi vs Jill McKeon / Janet Marks5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Windemuller vs Liz Magill3-6, 5-7
2022-05-19vs LEBTC SILVERWon 50
W#1 DoublesMichelle Windemuller / Ana Cruz vs Kim Belitz / Monica Bogue6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFenny Evers vs Kelly Raab6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJodie Wang / Philippa Biggi vs Kelley Treichel / Marcy Butler6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEMILY JENNINGS vs Jane Braaten3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Hoppe / Leann Koontz vs Angelena Gleason / Bobbie Turner6-4, 6-4
2022-05-12vs KC SILVERLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichelle Windemuller / Jodie Wang vs AMY CLARKE / Susanna Evans1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTaylor Carney vs Lauren Plain6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Killion / Philippa Biggi vs Nancy Crease / Christie Weber6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEMILY JENNINGS vs Kathleen Schuster5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeann Koontz / Lynn Hoppe vs Carolyn Souk / Christie Hughes2-6, 3-6
2022-05-05vs HRCA ORANGELost 14
W#1 DoublesFenny Evers / Jodie Wang vs Jill Cleverdon / Nhi Lai6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTaylor Carney vs Terry Fiala6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Killion / Michelle Windemuller vs Nicola Zalkind / Jill Cooper0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEMILY JENNINGS vs Carey Madsen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSue Carmody / Leann Koontz vs Carol Parrish / Lesli Dumler4-6, 3-6
2022-04-28vs PH BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichelle Windemuller / Ana Cruz vs Simne Langton / Suzanne Perkins3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTaylor Carney vs Noel Litchkowski6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Jodie Wang vs Lori Hearty / Tricia Vath7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesFenny Evers vs Kristin McDonald7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLeann Koontz / Lynn Hoppe vs Katie Mohler / Karyn Snee2-6, 4-6
2022-04-21vs KC GOLDWon 32
W#1 DoublesFenny Evers / Jodie Wang vs Teresa Granath / Marjie Tokarski5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTaylor Carney vs Anne Fox2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Killion / Philippa Biggi vs Lori Thorp / Kimberly Borchelt4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesEMILY JENNINGS vs Stacey Persichetti6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Hoppe / Sue Carmody vs Kim Rachwalski / Presley Pearson7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Taylor Carney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.68
Jodie Wang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Fenny Evers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.24
EMILY JENNINGS
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Sue Carmody
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Ana Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Lisa Killion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Michelle Windemuller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.69
Philippa Biggi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Leann Koontz
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Lynn Hoppe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philippa Biggi + Leann Koontz41142% games+4.3% vs expected
Fenny Evers + Michelle Windemuller5449% games+3.7% vs expected
Lynn Hoppe + Leann Koontz1644% games+1.6% vs expected
Philippa Biggi + Lisa Killion1432% games+0.1% vs expected
Ana Cruz + Michelle Windemuller6843% games−0.1% vs expected
Philippa Biggi + Michelle Windemuller2437% games−4.6% vs expected
Lynn Hoppe + Lisa Killion0530% gamesnot enough data
Fenny Evers + Sue Carmody3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Carney
30W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Jodie Wang
40W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%9%91%
3.68
4
Fenny Evers
46W–43L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
EMILY JENNINGS
31W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Sue Carmody
22W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Ana Cruz
17W–33L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Lisa Killion
20W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Michelle Windemuller
42W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Philippa Biggi
62W–106L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Leann Koontz
54W–100L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
2.59
Lynn Hoppe
13W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.