Teams

Kochersperger, Cindy

2021 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 - Weekend · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-28vs Bennett, ConnieLost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Groves / Cindy Kochersperger vs Carol Schmer / Beth Phillips1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNatalie Gillaspie vs Natalie Neal5-7, 2-5
W#2 DoublesAlysen Abel / Angela Fredericks vs Cathy Czir / Nancy Ifft6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristine Ogden / Barb Ginavan vs Beth Mundhenke / Karen Rogers5-7, 5-7
2021-03-21vs Wood, BarbaraLost 03
L#1 DoublesKris Gronau / Christina Gondring vs Marcia Moroney / Natalie Atwater2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Caffrey / Jeannette Baumler vs Barbara Wood / Tara Gatti1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Fredericks / Cindy Kochersperger vs Janet Gose / Patricia Mitchell5-7, 4-2, 0-1
2021-03-14vs Nelson, CydneyLost 13
L#1 DoublesCindy Kochersperger / Christine Ogden vs Brenda Moore / Maria Moore3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Chaplin vs Jennifer Shore3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKris Gronau / Christina Gondring vs Cynthia Petrie / Cydney Nelson4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Crawford / Deborah Castaner vs Sara Gilson / Eileen Grebowiec3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-03-07vs Sanders, KimberlyLost 13
L#1 DoublesKatie Chaplin / Christina Gondring vs Kimberly Sanders / Melanie Cohavi2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBeth Caffrey vs Brenda Foree0-6, 4-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Crawford / Christine Ogden vs Kim McRae / Mary Kenady6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Groves / Lynn Looloian vs Amy Fisch / Megan Baker6-0, 6-2
2021-02-28vs Edwards, AliceLost 04
L#1 DoublesCindy Kochersperger / Alysen Abel vs Susan McConkey / Dina Mitchell2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDeborah Castaner vs Amanda Miller1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKris Gronau / Barb Ginavan vs Marti Huffman / Natalie Hartman2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannette Baumler / Lynn Looloian vs Michele McIntosh / Melanie Goodlow-Vinduska4-6, 4-4
2021-02-21vs Krishna, AngelLost 04
L#1 DoublesAlysen Abel / Cindy Kochersperger vs Angel Krishna / Missy Kotre3-6, 2-5
L#1 SinglesBeth Caffrey vs Liz Krull2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKris Gronau / Barb Ginavan vs Ruth Ospino / Melinda McCalla1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Crawford / Natalie Gillaspie vs Judy Yi / Stephanie Eilert2-6, 3-6
2021-02-14vs Thompson, LauraLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngela Fredericks / Cindy Kochersperger vs Karen Ramsden / Maureen Lobdell3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Caffrey vs Robin Ayers2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeannette Baumler / Kris Gronau vs Pamela ODonnell / Rebecca Kowalczyk6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Gondring / Katie Chaplin vs Meta Cunningham / Jane Slavik1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Alysen Abel
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Mary Groves
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Deborah Castaner
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.83
Cindy Kochersperger
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.80
Janet Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Barb Ginavan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Angela Fredericks
published
Beth Caffrey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jeannette Baumler
published
Katie Chaplin
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Kris Gronau
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Lynn Looloian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Gillaspie
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Fredericks + Alysen Abel6457% games+8.2% vs expected
Alysen Abel + Mary Groves392356% games+4.1% vs expected
Janet Crawford + Natalie Gillaspie61247% games+3.9% vs expected
Cindy Kochersperger + Alysen Abel2740% games+2.6% vs expected
Cindy Kochersperger + Kris Gronau51245% games+1.3% vs expected
Beth Caffrey + Natalie Gillaspie3543% games−1.6% vs expected
Janet Crawford + Cindy Kochersperger62936% games−3.8% vs expected
Kris Gronau + Barb Ginavan1734% games−9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alysen Abel
175W–139L career · 9 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
Mary Groves
97W–60L career · 2 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Deborah Castaner
61W–84L career · 6 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Cindy Kochersperger
34W–123L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
Janet Crawford
85W–105L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Barb Ginavan
24W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Angela Fredericks
10W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Beth Caffrey
10W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeannette Baumler
2W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Katie Chaplin
28W–61L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kris Gronau
16W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lynn Looloian
17W–49L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Gillaspie
67W–63L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.