Teams

Rocky Mtn Tennis-Sakar/Turner

2021 Winter League-Weekday · 2.5W AM

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-29Won 10
W#1 SinglesCorinne Wudel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-22vs Ogden-ComptonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLexie Sakar / Jill Clark vs Kate Dickman / Nicole Compton4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Nixon / Corinne Wudel vs Denette Charlton / Kelti Palmer1-6, 4-6
2021-03-15vs Rocky Mtn Tennis-Petersen/CaldwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrittany Archibald / Corinne Wudel vs Liz Donaldson / Celeste Livingston6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-03-08vs Red Ledges-WoodLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Brotherson / Brittany Archibald vs Shana Wood / Carly Johnston0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLexie Sakar vs Giuliana Willis1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCorinne Wudel / Julia Nixon vs Michelle Stauffer / Elisabeth Jones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-03-01Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLexie Sakar / Jennifer Brotherson vs Brooke Rollins / Traci Ashton0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrittany Archibald vs Tiffany Zarbock0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Nixon / Jill Clark vs Jodi Bloechel / Lisa Packer0-6, 0-6
2021-02-22vs Ivory Ridge-BroadbentLost 02
L#1 DoublesLexie Sakar / Corinne Wudel vs Jasmine Byers / Cara Larson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Clark / Jennifer Brotherson vs Kelly Chipman / Miriam Moore0-6, 3-6
2021-02-08vs Cottonwood Club-SummerhaysLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrittany Archibald / Corinne Wudel vs Lindy Parks / Kristin Rocke2-6, 2-6
2021-02-01vs Wasatch Rec-DavisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Clark / Brittany Archibald vs Jennifer Mcbride / Linda Judy3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLexie Sakar vs Jennifer Davies1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Corinne Wudel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brittany Archibald
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Jennifer Brotherson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julia Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lexie Sakar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Archibald + Corinne Wudel5260% games+7.1% vs expected
Corinne Wudel + Jennifer Brotherson3458% games+7.0% vs expected
Brittany Archibald + Jennifer Brotherson6554% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corinne Wudel
65W–47L career · 6 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Brittany Archibald
33W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Brotherson
28W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julia Nixon
9W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lexie Sakar
1W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.