Teams

Espresso

2025 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-07vs NWW-NaritaLost 01
L#1 DoublesDjelli Berisha / ADITYA MIDDHA vs Kojiro Narita / Daniel Yu2-6, 2-6
2025-08-06vs RinsedWon 10
W#1 DoublesDjelli Berisha / Yuta Chen vs Christopher Truong / Oscar Cruz6-2, 6-2
2025-08-05vs Poznick - HogbenWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvan Pan / Kyle Swain vs Darren Hogben / John Easley6-3, 6-1
2025-07-27vs CleaningLost 01
L#1 DoublesEvan Pan / James Crosetto vs Darrell Huang / Austin Hamamoto3-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs NWW-LamLost 01
L#1 DoublesDjelli Berisha / Yuta Chen vs Wendell Watanabe / Brian Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-15vs NWW-ParrishWon 10
W#1 DoublesDjelli Berisha / James Crosetto vs Hiromichi Yamamoto / Maros Blaha2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-14vs Sets in the CityLost 01
L#1 DoublesDjelli Berisha / James Crosetto vs Dustin Hedger / Kevin ODonnell4-6, 0-6
2025-07-12vs Mann 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJames Crosetto / Kyle Swain vs Jacob Mann / Ethan Griffith6-4, 6-1
2025-07-08vs Spin CycleWon 10
W#1 DoublesDjelli Berisha / ADITYA MIDDHA vs Brian McKittrick / Matthew Bowser6-2, 6-4
2025-06-20vs Tiebreak LoversWon 10
W#1 DoublesDjelli Berisha / Jayson Shieh vs Alexander Calpagiu / Andrew Huang6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-Lam6060234
2NWW-Shmotolokha5151233
3Espresso4242451
4Summer Slugs3333754
5Tiebreak Haters2424847
6Rinsed15151065
7Tiebreak Lovers06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Evan Pan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Djelli Berisha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Kyle Swain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
ADITYA MIDDHA
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
James Crosetto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ADITYA MIDDHA + Djelli Berisha5453% games+12.3% vs expected
Djelli Berisha + Evan Pan4257% games+6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Evan Pan
66W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.54
4.5
Djelli Berisha
117W–68L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.37
Kyle Swain
46W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
ADITYA MIDDHA
49W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
James Crosetto
53W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
4.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.