Teams

GT Bray Osher

2024 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.0 M Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-16vs Sarasota/Weitzel/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Vivek Kumar vs Peter Laughlin / Felipe Soto1-6, 2-6
2024-03-02vs Sarasota/Weitzel/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Michael Kimm vs Peter Laughlin / Felipe Soto6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-02-24vs GT Bray AbrahamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Antonio Nicolini vs Jeffrey Bucarion / Bradley Taylor6-2, 6-1
2024-02-10vs Sarasota/Weitzel/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Luke Zoetmulder vs Peter Laughlin / Felipe Soto7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-03vs GT Bray AbrahamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Antonio Nicolini vs Jeffrey Bucarion / Allan Hall6-0, 6-3
2024-01-20vs Sarasota/Weitzel/40&Over4.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Antonio Nicolini vs Luke Anderson / RON NOURSE3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Gaston Gonzalez
published 4.5
Antonio Nicolini
published 4
David Arrowood
published 4
3.75
Marc Pommainville
published
3.73
Mohamed Aboul-Ezz
published
3.72
Ross Williamson
published
3.66
Luke Zoetmulder
published
3.65
Michael Kimm
published
3.64
Jonathan Cranos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Larry Denyes
published
3.57
Nader Massoumi
published
3.52
Joseph Casanova
published
Steven Paley
published
Wayne Osher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Cranos + Antonio Nicolini3347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gaston Gonzalez
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
4.24
4
Antonio Nicolini
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
David Arrowood
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marc Pommainville
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Mohamed Aboul-Ezz
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Ross Williamson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Luke Zoetmulder
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
Michael Kimm
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jonathan Cranos
23W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Larry Denyes
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
Nader Massoumi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Joseph Casanova
0W–10L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Steven Paley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wayne Osher
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.