← Teams

R.Rubin

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-09vs D.Huffman 55+Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRod Boyle / Edward Poyo vs Billy Hinson / David Hodl6-4, 7-5
2023-05-02vs J.CockerhamWon 2–0
W#2 DoublesRod Boyle / Kelsey Nix vs Joseph Cockerham / Rick Melling5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdward Poyo / Arthur Rubin vs Mike Elstob / Ken Haney6-3, 6-4
2023-04-25vs J.Parham/SPatton 55+Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesRod Boyle / Edward Poyo vs McNair Bell / Robert Duggins6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRoger Hatlen / Paul Brinckerhoff vs John Richardson / Randall Harrill6-1, 6-4
2023-04-18vs M.Benecky 55 3.5MenWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesRod Boyle / Edward Poyo vs Mark Gentry / Reymond Lozares6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelsey Nix / Paul Brinckerhoff vs Mike Boisjolie / Steven Rochkind6-1, 6-3
2023-03-28vs R.LouzaoSplit 1–1
L#2 DoublesPaul Brinckerhoff / Edward Poyo vs Jeff Keisner / John Flagg2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRod Boyle / Gary Pysz vs Raul Louzao / Steve Schinkel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-21vs D.Shuman 3.5Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesEdward Poyo / Arthur Rubin vs Thomas Milici / David Shuman6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Brinckerhoff / Richard Rubin vs James Kriete / Jeffrey Miller6-2, 6-1
2023-03-14vs D.SwannLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKelsey Nix / Edward Poyo vs Vincent Conzola / Robert Chandler3-6, 4-6
2023-03-07vs M.KocurekWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesEdward Poyo / Kelsey Nix vs John Rhoades / Charles Ashby6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Roger Hatlen
published —
3.38
Edward Poyo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Arthur Rubin
published 3.5
3.23
Craig Leese
published 3.5
3.20
Paul Brinckerhoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Rod Boyle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.97
Kelsey Nix
published —
—
Julian Barnes
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rod Boyle + Edward Poyo5–265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Roger Hatlen
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Edward Poyo
144W–61L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Arthur Rubin
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Craig Leese
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Paul Brinckerhoff
93W–99L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Rod Boyle
64W–73L career · 6 lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
—
Kelsey Nix
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
—
Julian Barnes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.