Teams

The Lob-stahs/OKC

2023 ESL Fall 18&over League · 2.5

4 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-30vs Over Served/OKCLost 01
L#1 SinglesClaire Turmelle vs Danielle Coats1-6, 0-6
2022-10-20vs OKC FALL: Love Hurts/OKCWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Galatian / Claire Turmelle vs Robyn Brewster / Katie Brown6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-13vs Drop Shots/QCWon 10
W#2 DoublesSydney Willis / Claire Turmelle vs Mary Fitch / Alisa Ratzlaff6-4, 6-0
2022-10-06vs No Strings Attached/OKCWon 20
W#1 SinglesClaire Turmelle vs Bailey Bright6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiana Galatian / Emily Tremblay vs Anastasia Svec / Amanda Milic6-3, 6-2
2022-09-29vs Wise Aces/OKCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRachael Weber / Diana Galatian vs Leighann Price / Taylor Orndorff6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSydney Willis vs Megan Fleischfresser6-0, 6-0
2022-09-22vs All That Racquet/QCWon 10
W#1 SinglesDiana Galatian vs Marissa Wray6-2, 6-2
2022-09-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSydney Willis / Claire Turmelle vs Crystal James / Teresa Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-08vs The Racquettes/OKCLost 01
L#1 DoublesSydney Willis / Claire Turmelle vs Alison Garrett / Jennifer Grantham5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKC FALL: Love Hurts/OKC9023412147
2Drop Shots/QC6318924199
3You've Been Served/OKC63141327215
4TD Academy 2.5/WW5216511124
5Over Served/OKC44131124195
6Wise Aces/OKC44101431228
7The Racquettes/OKC45131430230
8The Lob-stahs/OKC2571429193
9All That Racquet/QC1751938256
10No Strings Attached/OKC0842042253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Diana Galatian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.27
Claire Turmelle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Leslie Lopez
published
Sydney Willis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Turmelle + Sydney Willis4263% gamesnot enough data
Claire Turmelle + Diana Galatian2338% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diana Galatian
29W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
2.5
Claire Turmelle
32W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
Leslie Lopez
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sydney Willis
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.