Teams

Prekeges

Coed Social League · 6.0 Bainbridge Islanders

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-20vs The Leftovers-FanbergLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesKathleen Ericksen / Pamela Olson vs Molly Linhardt / Annie Fanberg2-6
L#1 Female SinglesKathleen Ericksen vs Molly Linhardt4-6
2025-08-06Won 20
W#1 Female DoublesRachael Alnwick / Pamela Olson vs N/A6-0
W#1 Female SinglesKathleen Ericksen vs N/A6-0
2025-07-30vs BastWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesKathleen Ericksen vs Erica Wiechers7-6
2025-07-23vs The Leftovers-FanbergSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesRachael Alnwick / Deirdre Black vs Annie Fanberg / Molly Linhardt4-6
W#1 Female SinglesKathleen Ericksen vs Kathrine Wright6-1
2025-07-16vs HOT Wheels! PerkinsWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesKathleen Ericksen / Pamela Olson vs Amy Wetter / Pondra Perkins6-3
W#1 Female SinglesKathleen Ericksen vs Amy Wetter6-2
2025-07-09vs BastSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesPamela Olson / Kathleen Ericksen vs Amanda Bast / Karen Walker6-4
L#1 Female SinglesRachael Alnwick vs Amanda Bast0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0 Bainbridge Islanders
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bast06231313130
2The Leftovers-Fanberg06191717161
3Prekeges06162020150
4HOT Wheels! Perkins0682828188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Pamela Olson
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Kathleen Ericksen
usually #1 Female Singles 83%, also #1 Female Doubles 17% · published 3
2.67
Rachael Alnwick
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3
Bill Tomer
published 2.5
Deirdre Black
published
Peter Prekeges
published
Ross Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Ericksen + Pamela Olson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Pamela Olson
65W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
2.98
3
Kathleen Ericksen
32W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Rachael Alnwick
56W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
2.5
Bill Tomer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Deirdre Black
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Prekeges
4W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Wilson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.