Teams

CCOC

2021 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-31vs MEMPKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKrista McCallister / Ivy Webb vs Amy Obenchain / Diane Klanecky7-6, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJillian Mayles vs Kelly Cavanaugh6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-24vs MEMPKWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarbi Bailey / Erin Hubert vs Rebecca Cuntz / Kelly Cavanaugh6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJillian Mayles vs Bonnie Iten6-4, 6-3
2021-08-17vs MEMPKWon 10
W#1 SinglesJillian Mayles vs Kelly Cavanaugh6-4, 7-5
2021-08-10vs MEMPKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIvy Webb / Krista McCallister vs Carmen Ekblad / Rebecca Cuntz6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJillian Mayles vs Bonnie Iten6-1, 6-1
2021-08-03vs MEMPKWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Hubert / Barbi Bailey vs Diane Klanecky / Amy Obenchain7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJillian Mayles vs Carmen Ekblad6-3, 6-3
2021-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesJillian Mayles / Krista McCallister vs Lauren Fong / Virginia Barber7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Barbi Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Jillian Mayles
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Erin Hubert
published 4
Ivy Webb
published 4
3.65
Megan May
published
3.62
Krista McCallister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.20
Mary Simmons
published
3.12
Janet Luce
published
3.02
Johane Aertker
published
Denise Nenoff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jillian Mayles + Krista McCallister20755% games+4.3% vs expected
Megan May + Barbi Bailey6259% games+2.8% vs expected
Barbi Bailey + Erin Hubert9849% games+2.0% vs expected
Megan May + Krista McCallister2438% games−5.3% vs expected
Barbi Bailey + Krista McCallister4447% gamesnot enough data
Ivy Webb + Megan May3247% gamesnot enough data
Barbi Bailey + Jillian Mayles5068% gamesnot enough data
Janet Luce + Mary Simmons314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbi Bailey
73W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Jillian Mayles
78W–34L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Erin Hubert
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Ivy Webb
10W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Megan May
47W–39L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Krista McCallister
36W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mary Simmons
24W–33L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Janet Luce
14W–20L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
Johane Aertker
25W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.02
Denise Nenoff
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.