Teams

Milam 40s 8.5W Combo Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-20vs Nutt 40s 8.5W Combo Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Lombardino / Lynne Murray vs Beth Harris / Marla Barnwell1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Harlow / Kristin Williamson vs Beth Mayer / Sarah Dunning0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSallye Parker / Jill Perez vs Ai Terui / Lindsay Ray1-6, 6-7
2026-08-13vs Porter 40s 8.5W Combo Thurs PLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Harlow / Kristin Williamson vs Dabney Porter / Kristi Collins6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Evans / Laura Hertweck vs Catherine Stopka / Beverly Tuttle7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Buchanan / Cynthia Sarwi vs Paige Yates / Carol Schuck Dillon4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jill Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Kelly Lombardino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Samantha Harlow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Kristin Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Lynne Murray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Ann Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Ann Morris
published 4
3.67
Theresa Dubiel
published
3.64
Laura Hertweck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Cynthia Sarwi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Julie Buchanan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Nancye Milam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Lombardino + Kristin Williamson033 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Murray + Sallye Parker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Perez
29W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
Kelly Lombardino
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.94
Samantha Harlow
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.94
Kristin Williamson
40W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Lynne Murray
161W–88L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ann Evans
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Ann Morris
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Theresa Dubiel
48W–51L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Laura Hertweck
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Cynthia Sarwi
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Julie Buchanan
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Nancye Milam
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.