Teams

Williams/Kitchener

2023 18&Over Women Brooklyn · 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-13vs Bklyn: Fantera/BrennanLost 13
L#1 DoublesCaroline Bailey / Kimberlee Malaska vs Joy Gryson / Lisa Bohen1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKavitha Shastry vs Jennie KixMiller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHilah Williams / Jillian Kitchener vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Karan vs Julie Belanger3-6, 3-6
2023-07-06vs Bklyn: Fantera/BrennanLost 14
L#1 DoublesEmily Spilko / Caroline Bailey vs Lisa Bohen / Leah Hamos5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMaria DeMasi vs Elizabeth Larsen3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Yilmaz / Kim Gittleson vs Bridget Brennan / Maggie Brennan1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRosie Gray vs Julie Belanger6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJillian Kitchener / Emily Carter vs Nancy Bowen / Deborah Fantera4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-27vs Bklyn: Fantera/BrennanLost 13
L#1 DoublesRuby Cramer / Rosie Gray vs Nicole Gueron / Elizabeth Larsen2-6, 2-4
L#1 SinglesMaria DeMasi vs Joy Gryson2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJillian Kitchener vs Kate Brennan3-6, 1-3
W#3 DoublesEmily Carter / Kim Gittleson vs Ledra Solomon / Jennie KixMiller6-3, 3-2
2023-06-22vs Bklyn: Fantera/BrennanWon 32
L#1 DoublesEmily Spilko / Maria DeMasi vs Deanna D'Amore / Nicole Gueron2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Sharp vs Florence Wilson7-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesJillian Kitchener / Kavitha Shastry vs Deborah Fantera / Nancy Bowen4-6, 4-2
L#2 SinglesMarilyn Siegel vs Kate Brennan0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Franks / Kim Gittleson vs Nicole Mull / Ledra Solomon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-13vs Bklyn: Fantera/BrennanLost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Karan / Kimberlee Malaska vs Nicole Gueron / Liz Krieger1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Sharp vs Joy Gryson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRuby Cramer / Jillian Kitchener vs Deborah Fantera / Leah Hamos3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Franks / Hilah Williams vs Ledra Solomon / Jill Teitel7-6, 4-6
2023-06-04vs Bklyn: Fantera/BrennanWon 32
L#1 DoublesCaroline Bailey / Atsuko Kawai vs Lisa Bohen / Maggie Brennan1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Sharp vs Elizabeth Larsen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKavitha Shastry / Jillian Kitchener vs Gail Stone / Christie Bonilla5-7, 3-4
W#2 SinglesRosie Gray vs Florence Wilson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesHilah Williams / Emily Carter vs Bridget Brennan / Nicole Mull6-4, 6-1
2023-05-30vs Bklyn: Fantera/BrennanLost 05
L#1 DoublesEmily Carter / Emily Spilko vs Liz Krieger / Elizabeth Larsen2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAtsuko Kawai vs Lisa Bohen2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Bailey / Jillian Kitchener vs Christie Bonilla / Deanna D'Amore7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Karan vs Jennie KixMiller2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRosie Gray / Ruby Cramer vs Leah Hamos / Florence Wilson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bklyn: Fantera/Brennan07231024237
2Williams/Kitchener0792451350

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Caroline Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Emily Spilko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Kavitha Shastry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.82
Maria DeMasi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Sharp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
Jillian Kitchener
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
2.60
Connie Yilmaz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Ruby Cramer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Kimberlee Malaska
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Atsuko Kawai
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Hilah Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Karan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Gittleson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marilyn Siegel
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Rosie Gray
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Franks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jillian Kitchener + Ruby Cramer4247% games−1.5% vs expected
Rosie Gray + Ruby Cramer0725% games−14.8% vs expected
Jillian Kitchener + Caroline Bailey2640% games−19.8% vs expected
Jennifer Karan + Jillian Kitchener224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberlee Malaska + Connie Yilmaz033 matchesnot enough data
Kimberlee Malaska + Jennifer Karan033 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Bailey + Emily Spilko123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Bailey + Ruby Cramer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Bailey
8W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Emily Spilko
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kavitha Shastry
34W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Maria DeMasi
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Elizabeth Sharp
28W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jillian Kitchener
13W–21L career · 7 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Connie Yilmaz
11W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Ruby Cramer
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.45
Kimberlee Malaska
8W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.40
Atsuko Kawai
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Hilah Williams
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Karan
8W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Gittleson
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marilyn Siegel
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Rosie Gray
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Franks
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.