Teams

EW-PC-Kohan

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-12vs EW-WRAC-RechtinLost 12
W#1 DoublesDerek Peacock / Bart Munson vs David Jaquish / Mark Taylor1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWayne Kohan / Peter Rysavy vs Richard Lester / Stephen Knox5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Walter Josephson vs Greg Brizendine / Steve Ovenell4-6, 5-7
2026-04-12vs YTC-FergusonWon 30
W#1 DoublesWayne Kohan / Peter Rysavy vs Rick Vaughan / David Whiteside6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCraig Hansen / Bart Munson vs Terry Kempton / Ken Wagar7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Walter Josephson vs Terry Keenhan / Dan Ferguson6-4, 6-2
2026-04-11vs PFC-WillmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesWayne Kohan / Peter Rysavy vs Andre LaSalle / Jorge Pinos6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Walter Josephson vs Robert Vancott / Clark Richards6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMoe Davari / Craig Hansen vs Ray Willman / John Omlin3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Derek Peacock
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.31
Peter Rysavy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Wayne Kohan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Evan Mehlenbacher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Craig Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Bart Munson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Moe Davari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Walter Josephson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Moe Davari + Craig Hansen6749% games−1.2% vs expected
Walter Josephson + Evan Mehlenbacher61144% gamesnot enough data
Bart Munson + Craig Hansen2443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Derek Peacock
22W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.63
Peter Rysavy
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Wayne Kohan
89W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Evan Mehlenbacher
62W–83L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Craig Hansen
28W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Bart Munson
19W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Moe Davari
21W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Walter Josephson
26W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.