Teams

NaplesVixen's /Vanderbilt CC - Witters

2023 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-23vs Marco Ymca - ConteWon 10
W#1 DoublesCory Witters / Teresa Regelmann vs Pattie Yergler / Joyce Hail7-6, 6-0
2023-05-16vs Isles Of Collier - M. YoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Higgins / Cory Witters vs Kathleen Barger / Susan Ward6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesCory Witters / Teresa Regelmann vs Mia Delk / Sally Amato1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesCory Witters / Terri Higgins vs Jean Duffy / Doris Duignan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-27vs Valencia Bonita - GredingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Hoffman / Cory Witters vs Ellen Iverson / Bobbi Burnett6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-25vs Pelican Bay South - HowardWon 10
W#1 DoublesCory Witters / Diane Janiec vs Behnoosh Behmaram / Toni Marie Silverman6-2, 6-2
2023-04-18vs Fiddlers Creek - D. CooperWon 10
W#1 DoublesCory Witters / Diane Janiec vs Laura Fischer / Gail Gattas6-2, 6-2
2023-03-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesCory Witters / Diane Janiec vs Mary Delisi / Janet Elegant6-2, 7-6
2023-03-21vs VineyardsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCory Witters / Terri Higgins vs Jennifer Procacci / Patricia MacDonald5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Diane Janiec
published 3.5
3.37
Robin Siegel
published
3.19
Candice Chaffee
published 3.5
3.16
Cory Witters
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.16
Aster Leitner
published 3.5
3.13
Lynn Croteau
published
2.93
Ulla Wolff
published
2.88
Kelly Soucek
published
2.84
Barbara Horvath
published 3
2.72
Susan Turville
published
Lisa Taylor
published
Teresa Regelmann
published
Terri Higgins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cory Witters + Ulla Wolff3445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Janiec
34W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Robin Siegel
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Candice Chaffee
25W–40L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cory Witters
112W–125L career · 9 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Aster Leitner
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Lynn Croteau
36W–25L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Ulla Wolff
16W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kelly Soucek
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Barbara Horvath
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
Susan Turville
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Lisa Taylor
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Regelmann
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terri Higgins
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.