Teams

BHSC - Leake - Matchpoint

2026 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-16vs ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 MenWon 31
W#1 DoublesChris Stewart / Logan Martin vs Matt Jones / Gregory Parrish6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesCharles Leake vs Pablo Barrague5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChris Watson / Ryan McCormack vs Conor Welch / Christopher Raupp6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hedstrom / Shalendra Varma vs Eric Bryerton / Swapnil Sonkusare6-2, 6-2
2026-07-11vs ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 MenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCharles Leake / Shalendra Varma vs Christopher Raupp / John Lipinski6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRyan McCormack vs Marian Dic2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJP Hesford / Chris Stewart vs Pablo Barrague / Matt Jones7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLogan Martin / John Masselli vs Conor Welch / Gregory Parrish5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-07vs ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 MenWon 40
W#1 DoublesRyan McCormack / Chris Stewart vs Marian Dic / Swapnil Sonkusare6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesOmar Garriott vs Matt Jones7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShalendra Varma / John Masselli vs Conor Welch / Richard Sawyer6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Leake / JP Hesford vs Pablo Barrague / Christopher Raupp6-0, 7-5
2026-07-02vs ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 MenWon 31
W#1 DoublesOmar Garriott / Chris Stewart vs Matt Jones / Christopher Raupp7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChris Watson vs Pablo Barrague7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRoger Hale / Charles Leake vs Marian Dic / Conor Welch0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesShalendra Varma / Ryan McCormack vs Eric Bryerton / Swapnil Sonkusare6-4, 6-4
2026-06-24vs ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 MenWon 31
W#1 DoublesChris Stewart / JP Hesford vs Matt Jones / John Lipinski6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesOmar Garriott vs Marian Dic6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hedstrom / Logan Martin vs Eric Bryerton / Richard Sawyer6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRoger Hale / Shalendra Varma vs Swapnil Sonkusare / Conor Welch3-6, 3-6
2026-06-20vs ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 MenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesOmar Garriott / Ryan McCormack vs Eric Bryerton / Matt Jones6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJonathan Bingham vs Pablo Barrague3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShalendra Varma / Matthew Hedstrom vs Conor Welch / Christopher Raupp3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Leake / JP Hesford vs Swapnil Sonkusare / Richard Sawyer6-2, 6-2
2026-06-17vs ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 MenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCharles Leake / JP Hesford vs Pablo Barrague / Marian Dic4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJonathan Bingham vs Matt Jones1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLogan Martin / Matthew Hedstrom vs Gregory Parrish / Eric Bryerton7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRyan McCormack / Shalendra Varma vs Swapnil Sonkusare / John Lipinski6-2, 6-1
2026-06-11vs ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 MenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRoger Hale / John Masselli vs Pablo Barrague / Matt Jones0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesOmar Garriott vs Swapnil Sonkusare6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Leake / Chris Watson vs Gregory Parrish / Christopher Raupp6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLogan Martin / Matthew Hedstrom vs Marian Dic / John Lipinski2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BHSC - Leake - Matchpoint71211125254
2ACAC - DeSouza 3.5 Men17112145312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Omar Garriott
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.48
Logan Martin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.45
Chris Watson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Ryan McCormack
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
JP Hesford
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Charles Leake
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Shalendra Varma
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.99
Matthew Hedstrom
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
John Masselli
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Roger Hale
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jonathan Bingham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Logan Martin + Matthew Hedstrom224 matchesnot enough data
Charles Leake + JP Hesford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Omar Garriott
53W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.62
Logan Martin
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Chris Watson
3W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Ryan McCormack
7W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
JP Hesford
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Charles Leake
42W–53L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Shalendra Varma
11W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Matthew Hedstrom
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
John Masselli
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Roger Hale
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.80
Jonathan Bingham
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.