Teams

Fee - Acquaviva

2025 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-18vs Brevard/Campbell/Combo18&Over6.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenneth Tenbusch / Craig Tretheway vs David Castillo / Chad Helpling4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarcus Lumpkin / Sanjay Gopal vs Cameron Evans / Jamin Campbell0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAntonio Cedeno / David Stevens vs Grant Wells / Anilgowthamkumar Geddam7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-14vs Brevard/Campbell/Combo18&Over6.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesWILLIAM WOOD / Robert Dunn vs Rohit Menghani / Grant Wells1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarcus Lumpkin / David Stevens vs Cameron Evans / David Charitat2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAntonio Cedeno / Carl Acquaviva vs Anilgowthamkumar Geddam / Chad Helpling6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Kenneth Tenbusch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
WILLIAM WOOD
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Marcus Lumpkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
David Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Carl Acquaviva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Robert Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Antonio Cedeno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Craig Tretheway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Sanjay Gopal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Brent Mitchell
published 3
2.44
Jay Riffe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carl Acquaviva + David Stevens5354% games+14.2% vs expected
Jay Riffe + David Stevens2441% games+4.2% vs expected
Robert Dunn + David Stevens4644% games−4.1% vs expected
WILLIAM WOOD + Kenneth Tenbusch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Tenbusch
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
WILLIAM WOOD
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Marcus Lumpkin
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
David Stevens
23W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Carl Acquaviva
22W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Robert Dunn
17W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Antonio Cedeno
3W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Craig Tretheway
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Sanjay Gopal
5W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brent Mitchell
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Jay Riffe
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.