Teams

55 & Over M8.0 - Ponce Anibal Quintana

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over M8.0-Flight 2

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesJorge Hernandez-Julia / Antonio Faura-Clavell vs Nelson Diaz / Fred Carrasquillo6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGary Morales / Jose Rivera vs Jaime Pesquera / Hector Bonilla4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJorge Hernandez-Julia / Antonio Faura-Clavell vs Edwin Perez / Andres Munoz7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGary Morales / Jose Rivera vs Jose Alonso / Hector Vega6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAntonio Faura-Clavell / Jorge Hernandez-Julia vs William Brown / Raymond Halais6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAntonio Faura-Clavell / Jorge Hernandez-Julia vs William Micheo / Hector Bonilla7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGary Morales / Jose Rivera vs Carlos Morales / Nelson Diaz6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJose Rivera / Gary Morales vs Eric Halais / Raymond Halais6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAntonio Faura-Clavell / Jorge Hernandez-Julia vs Richard Lake / Luis Perez-Giusti6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over M8.0-Flight 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Antonio Faura-Clavell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Ismael Roque
published 4
3.62
3.58
Angel Ortiz
published 4
3.46
Gary Morales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Adalberto Ramirez
published 3.5
Anibal Quintana
published 3.5
3.14
Gilberto Cuevas
published 3.5
Ivan Collazo
published
Jose Juan Adaime
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antonio Faura-Clavell + Jorge Hernandez-Julia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Antonio Faura-Clavell
57W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Ismael Roque
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jorge Hernandez-Julia
25W–26L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Angel Ortiz
62W–29L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Gary Morales
41W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Adalberto Ramirez
8W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anibal Quintana
2W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gilberto Cuevas
45W–42L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Ivan Collazo
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jose Juan Adaime
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.