Teams

Ja.Bossert40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-12vs La.Hampton40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Cotner / Stacey Stephens vs Grace Poole / Darsan Russo6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMargaret Barham / Jessica Tyndall vs Susan Potter / Lauren Hampton4-6, 3-6
2024-09-28vs Kr.Patch40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Cotner / Corinna Proctor vs Sally Highsmith / Kelly Jones3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Tyndall / Rachel Bonistalli vs Merrit Lumsden / Gail Scoggin2-6, 2-6
2024-09-21vs Ch.Brandt40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Stacey Stephens vs Lanier McRee / Kathan Griscik6-1, 6-1
2024-09-07vs Fr.Harris40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesJessica Tyndall / Rachel Bonistalli vs Allison Lee / Molly Chaffee1-6, 1-6
2024-08-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesRachel Bonistalli / Jessica Tyndall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-24vs Kr.Patch40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinna Proctor / AMY KOCH vs Gail Scoggin / Sally Highsmith6-7, 2-6
2024-08-21vs Fr.Harris40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Jennifer Cotner vs Cathy Marion / Mindy Hamlin6-1, 6-1
2024-08-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJessica Tyndall / Rachel Bonistalli vs Lacey Seaton / Melissa Pereira1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Stacey Stephens
published
3.01
Corinna Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
AMY KOCH
published 3
2.60
Jessica Tyndall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.56
Allison Dugan
published 3
2.54
Jennifer Cotner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Margaret Barham
published
2.28
Kristin Wehmeyer
published
2.23
Jane Bossert
published
2.07
Rachel Bonistalli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinna Proctor + Jennifer Cotner4162% gamesnot enough data
Allison Dugan + Margaret Barham224 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Stephens + Corinna Proctor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Stephens
24W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Corinna Proctor
74W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
AMY KOCH
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
49W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%22%78%
2.60
3
Allison Dugan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Jennifer Cotner
36W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%38%62%
2.54
Margaret Barham
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%64%36%
2.46
Kristin Wehmeyer
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.28
Jane Bossert
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.23
Rachel Bonistalli
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.