Teams

The Deucebags

2021 Howard-Columbia Mixed 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Mixed 18 & over 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-04-11vs Jess Do It 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Deleonibus / Elizabeth Deleonibus vs Bradley Jacques / Lacey Gordon1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Lahmann / Jodi Saxman vs Kristina Leary / Peter Hong2-6, 2-6
2021-03-21vs YepWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Haney / John Deleonibus vs Greg Koch / Emily Barry6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-02-27vs Racquet ScientistsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Saxman / Robert Lahmann vs Kim Dowd / Xavier Cha2-6, 0-6
2021-02-21vs AlewinnersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Haney / Robert Wasson vs Sandy Segrist / Jim Leveque1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-02-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Lahmann / Jodi Saxman vs Betty Wang / Gregory Brown0-6, 3-6
2021-01-24vs The FugeesLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Deleonibus / John Deleonibus vs John Lee / Jennifer Lee2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Robert Wasson vs Vince Sbarra / Shannon Shapiro3-6, 4-6
2021-01-17vs Munshell7.0MixSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Deleonibus / John Deleonibus vs Kyle Hasty / Robin Khan2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Robert Wasson vs Christine Lee / James DeMasi6-4, 6-2
2021-01-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Lahmann / Jodi Saxman vs Ugur Erickson / Ali Kart7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Mixed 18 & over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Beth Steinberg
published 4.5
3.45
Tom Norris
published
3.43
John Deleonibus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Adam Drucker
published 3.5
3.34
Peggy Koele
published
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Michael Maiorana
published
3.25
Lynn Drucker
published
2.91
Jodi Saxman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ann Maiorana
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Haney + John Deleonibus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth Steinberg
12W–13L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.92
Tom Norris
11W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
John Deleonibus
149W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Adam Drucker
11W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.35
Peggy Koele
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
Michael Maiorana
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Lynn Drucker
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Jodi Saxman
28W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Ann Maiorana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.