Teams

DStern (OPRC)

2024 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Men - Sat PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-27vs JCato (Matthews)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Comisar / Oscar Cranz vs John Trimp / Berry Allison6-1, 6-4
2024-04-20vs DBrantmeyer (Palisades)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCarl Cooke / Neil Handelsman vs William Merlo / Jay Tiedeman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Comisar / Jerry Tylman vs John England / Scott Swanson6-2, 6-1
2024-04-06vs JCato (Matthews)Won 10
W#2 DoublesNeil Handelsman / Oscar Cranz vs Dean Belk / Tim Melton6-2, 6-1
2024-03-30vs DBrantmeyer (Palisades)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRod Spence / Carl Cooke vs Jay Tiedeman / Kevin Green6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-16vs JCato (Matthews)Won 10
W#2 DoublesEric Tan / Rod Spence vs Berry Allison / Dean Belk6-0, 6-1
2024-03-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesRod Spence / Trip Caldwell vs Dan Brantmeyer / Scott Nichols6-1, 6-4
2024-02-24vs JCato (Matthews)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTrip Caldwell / Rod Spence vs Thomas Mattapallil / Tim Melton6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNeil Handelsman / John Deering vs Mike Farley / Rod Hartley6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Men - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Eric Tan
published 4.5
4.37
John Deering
published
4.34
Neil Handelsman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Rod Spence
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Daniel Comisar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Carl Cooke
published 4.5
4.13
Joel Turner
published
Frank Lowe
published
Oscar Cranz
published
Trip Caldwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neil Handelsman + Daniel Comisar6458% games−0.9% vs expected
Eric Tan + Rod Spence213 matchesnot enough data
Joel Turner + Oscar Cranz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Tan
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.50
John Deering
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Neil Handelsman
58W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Rod Spence
103W–35L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Daniel Comisar
90W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Carl Cooke
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
Joel Turner
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.13
Frank Lowe
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Oscar Cranz
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trip Caldwell
12W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.