Teams

LCTA18/Landeo/MPR

LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.0 Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-01vs LCTA18/Hakimi-Sigman/Snee FarmLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Landeo / Alice Petzold vs Katie Hakimi / Kari Ryan2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Hutto / Katherine Groft vs Olivia Sigman / Sarah Page Atkins6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRobin White vs Jennifer Wells6-7, 3-6
2025-09-17vs LCTA18/Moss-Rinaca/SneeFarmLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Hutto / Alice Petzold vs Brielle Cotter / Molly Hatfield2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRobin White vs McRae Hogan6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Petree / Amy Chico vs Laura Prince / Jennifer Ireland6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Fall League Women 3.0 Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Katherine Groft
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Heather Lucarelli
published
2.73
Robin White
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.67
Jessica Hutto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Christy Landeo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Alison McLean
published 2.5
2.48
Kelly O'Brien
published
2.48
Lauren Neese
published
2.38
Christi Lion
published 2.5
2.36
Laura Novotny
published
2.22
Lana Kammer
published
2.09
Stephanie Petree
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Carley Westcott
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Landeo + Lauren Neese2345% games+4.9% vs expected
Laura Novotny + Lana Kammer4646% games+4.3% vs expected
Alison McLean + Stephanie Petree2747% games−0.5% vs expected
Jessica Hutto + Christy Landeo4939% games−9.2% vs expected
Jessica Hutto + Katherine Groft314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Groft
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Heather Lucarelli
43W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Robin White
56W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Jessica Hutto
29W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Christy Landeo
43W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
2.5
Alison McLean
29W–19L career · no lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Kelly O'Brien
24W–41L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Lauren Neese
28W–25L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Christi Lion
12W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Laura Novotny
30W–36L career · no lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Lana Kammer
29W–44L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Stephanie Petree
23W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Carley Westcott
3W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.