Teams

LWR Sharks

2023 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 8.5 W Thursday

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-30vs Cedars Island Girls 8.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesChristie Boylston / Sandy Severs vs Wendy Hillock / Cindy Fancher2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGina Damaia / Diana Stadelnikas vs Kristin Knous / SueAnn Sanders6-1, 6-0
2023-11-02vs Payne Park WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Hagopian / Allyson Hoffman vs Sue Green / Jane Doe6-1, 7-5
2023-10-26vs Cedars Island Girls 8.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesGina Hagopian / Allyson Hoffman vs Cindy Fancher / Carrie Carretta6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristie Boylston / Sandy Severs vs Lisa Tyson / Yuka Pearl6-1, 6-4
2023-10-19vs Sarasota/Deuitch/50&Over8.5WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAllyson Hoffman / Gina Hagopian vs Christine Vecchione / Connie Weiss3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSheila Perry / Sandy Severs vs Beth Costa / Janet Kramer6-1, 6-4
2023-10-12vs SSC RosesWon 20
W#1 DoublesGina Hagopian / Allyson Hoffman vs Tracy Fang / Lisa Temple6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSandy Severs / Elizabeth Green vs Ann Davy / Michele Rose6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-05vs Sarasota/Deuitch/50&Over8.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllyson Hoffman / Gina Hagopian vs Susan Gammon / Ana Areosa5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-28vs Payne Park WilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeggy Winsler / Sandy Severs vs Cindy Rosenberg / Lisa Klemeyer5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Sandra Barkey vs Sally Alford / Kara Beene5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Allyson Hoffman
published 4.5
4.30
Christie Boylston
published 4.5
3.83
Gina Hagopian
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Heidi Cox
published
3.74
Elizabeth Goelz
published
3.70
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Karen Nicholson
published
3.69
Sheila Perry
published
3.59
Elizabeth Green
published
Sandy Severs
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Green + Allyson Hoffman2354% games+6.6% vs expected
Diana Stadelnikas + Sandy Severs3447% games−3.2% vs expected
Gina Hagopian + Sandy Severs2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allyson Hoffman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Christie Boylston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
4
Gina Hagopian
70W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Heidi Cox
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Elizabeth Goelz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Sandy Severs
83W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.