Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

28 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 28 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Shiraz Madan
published
4.40
Anastas Budagov
published 4.5
4.33
Harshit Mehta
published
4.31
Paul Liu
published
4.30
Carlos Basto
published 4.5
4.29
Abhishek Nishis
published 4.5
4.28
Christopher Abate
published 4.5
4.27
Minal Mishra
published
4.24
Kevin Margo
published
4.20
Robert Yee
published
4.11
Jay Saddler
published
4.07
Nghien Nguyen
published
4.04
Andre Nodem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.01
Tom Kent
published
4.00
Eugene Trilesnik
published
3.99
Vijay Sundaresan
published
3.96
An-Vincent Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Jonathan Trinh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Alex Vainberg
published 4
3.85
Dai Truong
published 4
3.82
Patrick Oakes
published
3.73
Lawrence Roseman
published
3.73
Rodney Wade
published
3.71
John Nakamura
published
3.69
Robert Gosalvez
published
3.62
Abhijeet Karnik
published 4
3.57
Gautham Arumugam
published
3.55
Hal Kalechofsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Oakes + Rodney Wade4456% games+13.3% vs expected
Patrick Oakes + Alex Vainberg3262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shiraz Madan
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Anastas Budagov
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
Harshit Mehta
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
4.33
Paul Liu
28W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Carlos Basto
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Abhishek Nishis
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Christopher Abate
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Minal Mishra
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Kevin Margo
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Robert Yee
22W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Jay Saddler
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Nghien Nguyen
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
4
Andre Nodem
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
Tom Kent
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Eugene Trilesnik
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Vijay Sundaresan
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
An-Vincent Nguyen
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
Jonathan Trinh
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.87
4
Alex Vainberg
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Dai Truong
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Patrick Oakes
25W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Lawrence Roseman
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Rodney Wade
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
John Nakamura
30W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Robert Gosalvez
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Abhijeet Karnik
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Gautham Arumugam
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Hal Kalechofsky
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.