Teams

Sterling Oaks - Pacana

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristine Turk / Cynthia Sabatino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-10vs Naples Reserve - HugginsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCynthia Sabatino / Michelle Suppes vs Thora Monette / Ramsay Erickson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudy Wilson / Christine Turk vs Gina Garfunkel / Susan Julich2-6, 2-6
2022-05-03vs Grey Oaks - LaveryLost 01
L#1 SinglesCynthia Sabatino vs Carol Polipnick2-6, 1-6
2022-04-12vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Suppes / Cynthia Sabatino vs Fiona Prentice / Kimberly Taylor6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-05vs Naples Grande - GardnerLost 01
L#3 DoublesNediljka Graf / Cynthia Sabatino vs Kristie McCormick / Wendy Garber1-6, 3-6
2022-03-29vs World Tennis CenterLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Steller / Cynthia Sabatino vs Gwendolyn Messonnier / Shae Rohling2-6, 3-6
2022-03-22vs Quail Creek - TumultyLost 01
L#3 DoublesJudy Wilson / Christine Turk vs Amanda Mallette / Nancy Nichols4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Stephanie Foley
published
3.92
Laurie Puddester
published
3.70
Nancy Krueger
published
3.57
Cynthia Sabatino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.25
Christine Turk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Nediljka Graf
published
Peggy Strakosch
published
Sandra Steller
published
Vesna Petrovic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Krueger + Laurie Puddester213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Foley
39W–27L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
Laurie Puddester
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
Nancy Krueger
17W–16L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Cynthia Sabatino
130W–89L career · 6 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Christine Turk
26W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Nediljka Graf
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggy Strakosch
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Steller
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vesna Petrovic
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.