Teams

Armstrong/18/5.5/MC/POTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 5.5 Shrev

18 players · average NTRP 2.79 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-06vs McCotter-Price/18/5.5/MC/STCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBryant Moore / Marshall Haynie vs David Callecod / Clay Simonton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJay Mitchell / Byron Landon vs Zachary Gifford / Jeffrey Price6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDouglas Bible / David Horaist vs Raymond Jarvis / Phillip Haley6-1, 6-3
2025-09-29vs Garcia/18/5.5/MC/QTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesByron Landon / Jack Adams vs Austin Hedges / Kevin Lamb6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCole Sartin / Bradley Phares vs Christopher Chen / Paul Gordon6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJerrod Farrington / David Horaist vs Thaddaeus Wallace / Jeremy Taylor3-6, 3-6
2025-09-22vs Thiels/18/5.5/MC/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesByron Godwin / Jack Adams vs Aaron Hunt / David Wilkes0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesByron Landon / Kevin Flood vs Brodie Romero / Caleb Kwok1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJason McElveen / Marshall Haynie vs Caleb Pipes / Corey Pepper4-6, 2-6
2025-09-15vs Goebel/18/5.5/M/QTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesByron Godwin / Jack Adams vs Luis Martinez-nater / Justin Ketchum6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBryant Moore / Bradley Phares vs Matthew Walsh / Steven Bush4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJason McElveen / Marshall Haynie vs Benjamin Desobry / Timothy Walsh6-1, 6-2
2025-09-08vs Estess/18/5.5/MC/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJay Mitchell / Cole Sartin vs Jordan Pearson / Timothy Chance6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJerrod Farrington / Weber Hill vs Travis Estess / Curtis Guillot6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDouglas Bible / David Horaist vs Brandon Chapman / Josh Burton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-25vs Wood/18/5.5/MC/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesByron Landon / Jay Mitchell vs Chad Boudreau / Lance Mosley6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJason McElveen / Tyler Comeaux vs Jake Wood / Charlie Euichol Ha6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesByron Godwin / Kevin Flood vs John Walker / Marshall Vick6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Jason McElveen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Cole Sartin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Byron Landon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Jack Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Tyler Comeaux
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Benjamin Israel
published 3
2.69
Jay Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Jerrod Farrington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Byron Godwin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Weber Hill
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.51
Marshall Haynie
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Kevin Flood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Bobby Horne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Bradley Phares
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
David Horaist
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Douglas Bible
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Solis
published
Will Rhodes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Flood + Weber Hill123 matchesnot enough data
Byron Godwin + Byron Landon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason McElveen
14W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Cole Sartin
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Byron Landon
17W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Jack Adams
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Tyler Comeaux
13W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Benjamin Israel
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Mitchell
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Jerrod Farrington
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Byron Godwin
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Weber Hill
14W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Marshall Haynie
21W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
Kevin Flood
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Bobby Horne
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Bradley Phares
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
David Horaist
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Douglas Bible
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Solis
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Rhodes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.