Teams

IE-MTC-Smash Sisters-Shelter

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-08vs IE-Bear Creek Bellas-HaggertyWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaria Rosario Diaz / Olivia Macdonald vs Judy Alexander / Lori Borresen0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Eybsen / Leah Montesinos vs Barbara Osland / Natalie LeBaron6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Genao / Lindsay Popplewell vs Michelle Fogal / Susan Britton6-0, 6-1
2025-11-02vs IE-Canyon Lake-TavernerWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Montesinos / Amy Eybsen vs Alicia Taverner / Kim Hoyer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Popplewell / Ericka Howard vs Sandee Clow / Cathy Garza6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaria Rosario Diaz / Olivia Macdonald vs Jennifer Helbock / Kate Szuba2-6, 0-6
2025-10-19vs IE-MTC-Slice Girls-ShelterLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Eybsen / Lindsay Popplewell vs Heidi Jones / Valleri Merrill6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmy Genao / Christina Holloway vs Anna Rateau / Samira Kashani2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Rosario Diaz / Ericka Howard vs Danna Cobbe / Debra Sherbert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Lindsay Popplewell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Amy Genao
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.41
Amy Eybsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.38
Olivia Macdonald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Asher Lutz
published 2.5
2.31
Ericka Howard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.16
Christina Holloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.97
Maria Rosario Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Leah Montesinos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Rosario Diaz + Olivia Macdonald0510% games−22.2% vs expected
Christina Holloway + Olivia Macdonald044 matchesnot enough data
Amy Genao + Lindsay Popplewell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Popplewell
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Amy Genao
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
2.5
Amy Eybsen
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Olivia Macdonald
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.38
2.5
Asher Lutz
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Ericka Howard
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Christina Holloway
0W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Maria Rosario Diaz
0W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Leah Montesinos
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.