Teams

Tony Roldan

2025 Springfield Adult 18 & Over Fall Leagues · 3.0 Fall Session 2 Adult Men

5 players · average NTRP / MISSOURI

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Fall Session 2 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jeff Marlin
published
Kevin Hofmeister
published
Kevin Liljenquist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Ross Roark
published
Tony Roldan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Marlin + Tony Roldan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Marlin
22W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Hofmeister
35W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Liljenquist
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Roark
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Roldan
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.