Teams

Elliott - All The Single Ladies 3.0

2026 Baltimore Singles · Baltimore Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.70 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-31vs Biggs - All the Singles LadiesWon 20
W#1 SinglesNicole Cameron vs Candace Tomczak6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKate Matterer vs Rebekah Noven6-3, 6-2
2026-08-30vs Biggs - All the Singles LadiesWon 30
W#1 SinglesCarol Vidal vs Jennifer Yapsuga6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNicole Cameron vs Candace Tomczak6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKate Matterer vs Tannan Hagyard6-2, 6-1
2026-08-27vs Biggs - All the Singles LadiesLost 12
L#1 SinglesCarol Vidal vs Jennifer Yapsuga4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesIris Lau vs Rebekah Noven6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJamilla Galloway vs Shannon Biggs2-6, 3-6
2026-08-22vs Biggs - All the Singles LadiesLost 12
W#1 SinglesKate Matterer vs Keyonna Baker6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesShaunte Taswell vs Candace Tomczak6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJamilla Galloway vs Elizabeth Smith3-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs Biggs - All the Singles LadiesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesHannah Shea vs Keyonna Baker2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesIris Lau vs Tannan Hagyard6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-12vs Biggs - All the Singles LadiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesIris Lau vs Keyonna Baker3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesBree Caudill vs Tannan Hagyard2-6, 1-6
2026-07-30vs Biggs - All the Singles LadiesWon 21
W#1 SinglesKate Matterer vs Elizabeth Smith7-5, 4-4
L#2 SinglesHannah Shea vs Shannon Biggs6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJamilla Galloway vs Rebekah Noven6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Baltimore Singles 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Biggs - All the Singles Ladies2163763
2Elliott - All The Single Ladies 3.012361393

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Kate Matterer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.99
Nicole Cameron
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.85
Iris Lau
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Hannah Shea
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Carol Vidal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.47
Shaunte Taswell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.41
Jamilla Galloway
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Bree Caudill
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kate Matterer
29W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Nicole Cameron
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Iris Lau
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Hannah Shea
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Carol Vidal
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
2.5
Shaunte Taswell
78W–105L career · 1 line in 2026
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Jamilla Galloway
27W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Bree Caudill
1W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.