Teams

Chen

2024 CVTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Women 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKimsey Kendrick / Margie DeShon vs Amanda Kinder / Jennifer Odom6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-03vs Cargle (Rome)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesOlivia Williams / Margie DeShon vs Jill Robinson / Rebekah Waller4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-08-20vs LocklearWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimsey Kendrick / Kim Lamb vs Amanda Kinder / Phyllis Searles6-1, 6-2
2024-08-13vs Cargle (Rome)Won 10
W#3 DoublesOlivia Williams / Margie DeShon vs Haley Henderson / Beverley Floyd3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-07-31vs Cargle (Rome)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Roberts / Margie DeShon vs Ashley Venkatesu / Rebekah Waller3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-30vs LocklearWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathy Piller / Kim Lamb vs Debbie Bone / Sheila Jackson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOlivia Williams / Margie DeShon vs Cindy Logan / Cathy Powell6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Olivia Williams
published
3.53
Kim Lamb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Jamie Chen
published
3.47
Kelly Roberts
published
3.46
Shirley Rutledge
published
3.35
Kimsey Kendrick
published
3.27
Nancy Carr
published
3.19
Lucky Chan
published
3.08
Marsha Thompson
published
Kathy Piller
published
Margie DeShon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Lamb + Margie DeShon5258% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Chen + Lucky Chan6061% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Chen + Shirley Rutledge224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olivia Williams
29W–35L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Kim Lamb
215W–87L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Jamie Chen
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Kelly Roberts
38W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Shirley Rutledge
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Kimsey Kendrick
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35
Nancy Carr
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Lucky Chan
29W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.19
Marsha Thompson
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Kathy Piller
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.