Teams

ABroemel (Queens)

2024 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 3.0 - Thurs PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-11vs JMorse (JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Broemel / Neal Koger vs Philippe Greenberg / Nathiele Fadin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-18vs APurmort (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAllison Broemel / Aaron Foreman vs Danielle Gier / Steve Englehart1-6, 4-6
2024-07-11vs PSercer/KCronin (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJen Mugnano / Neal Koger vs Kathy Harborne / Matthew Wellman2-6, 1-6
2024-06-20vs KKuehner (Life Time)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Burns / Mallory Burns vs Jennifer Miles / Paul Galliano6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJen Mugnano / Aaron Foreman vs Luz Lim / Ryan Blumel6-3, 6-0
2024-06-13vs AAltamura (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Broemel / Harold Rosbottom vs Laura Dragon / Jeremy Klopfer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMallory Burns / Nick Larsen vs Virginia Wooten / Paul Jakubicki1-6, 1-6
2024-05-30vs KLee/SChandra (CTNC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAllison Broemel / Aaron Foreman vs Shruti Chandra / Brad Cohen3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMallory Burns / Jeffrey Burns vs Tyler Pasour / Vicki Greenway6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.0 - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Jeffrey Burns
published
3.16
Harold Rosbottom
published 3.5
2.97
Aaron Foreman
published 3
2.96
Kathryn Pride
published
2.95
Mallory Burns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Nick Larsen
published
2.91
Marissa Connolly
published
2.87
Sara Ash
published
2.87
Allison Broemel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Jen Mugnano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Noah Marley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Broemel + Aaron Foreman2342% games+0.8% vs expected
Mallory Burns + Jeffrey Burns213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Burns
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Harold Rosbottom
1W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Aaron Foreman
8W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kathryn Pride
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Mallory Burns
46W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Nick Larsen
17W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Marissa Connolly
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Sara Ash
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Allison Broemel
67W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Jen Mugnano
18W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Noah Marley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.