Teams

Combo

2025 Man · Cov Hold Teams

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Cov Hold Teams
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Combo000000
2Adult 55s000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Dana Gegenheimer
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.80
Elizabeth Guidotti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Ashley Neumann
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.67
Ellen Sweetman
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
Joelle Cuevas
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Kathie Daigle
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
Kim Kocken
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Melanie Olinde
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Peggy Benit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Regina Knight
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Stephanie Songy
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Trollie Estes
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Sweetman + Kathie Daigle4351% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Songy + Peggy Benit213 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Olinde + Joelle Cuevas123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Guidotti + Kim Kocken213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Kocken + Joelle Cuevas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Gegenheimer
7W–20L career · type A · 17 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Elizabeth Guidotti
9W–22L career · 20 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Ashley Neumann
18W–49L career · 13 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Ellen Sweetman
22W–41L career · 31 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Joelle Cuevas
34W–34L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathie Daigle
15W–17L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Kocken
37W–26L career · 38 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Olinde
8W–29L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Benit
8W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Regina Knight
21W–23L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Songy
20W–25L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trollie Estes
19W–9L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.