Teams

Teays Valley Porter

2023 OH OV A18&O · 2023 Winter

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Yeager / Mary Adams vs Tammy Robinson / Elizabeth Parker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-06vs CTC GreeneLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary Adams / Cindy Yeager vs Carrie Erlewine / Deborah Harmon1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMelanie Burdette vs Aileen Stacy2-6, 3-6
2023-04-29Won 20
W#2 DoublesMary Adams / Cindy Yeager vs Melissa Osborne / Kathy Wilson7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMelanie Burdette vs Elizabeth Parker6-3, 6-1
2023-04-23vs TIC Mabe/HohLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Porter / Cindy Yeager vs Ashlee Cooke / Rebekah Hoh1-6, 2-6
2023-04-22vs TIC Mabe/HohLost 03
L#1 SinglesTracy Billips vs Robin Shamblen6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Greene / Cindy Yeager vs Kelli Hinkle Mabe / Melissa Williams2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Porter / Melanie Burdette vs Caroline Green / Jimmie Baker1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-04-15vs CTC VelosoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarol Porter / Cindy Yeager vs Miri Hunter / Gwyneth Owen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Billips / Mary Adams vs Cheryl Spriggs / Lilah Michael4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-02-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Billips / Cindy Yeager vs Deborah Harmon / Kristin Warner1-6, 2-6
2023-02-18vs CTC VelosoLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelanie Burdette / Melinda White vs Mary Cook / Cheryl Spriggs3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Adams / Cindy Yeager vs Melanie McClellan / Gwyneth Owen1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Carol Porter
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4
2.95
Cindy Yeager
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Meagan Zentner
published
Melanie Burdette
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Melinda White
published
Meredith Greene
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Tracy Billips
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda White + Melanie Burdette112145% games−0.1% vs expected
Cindy Yeager + Carol Porter3448% gamesnot enough data
Carol Porter + Meagan Zentner1440% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Burdette + Carol Porter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Porter
70W–54L career · 12 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Cindy Yeager
8W–25L career · 8 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
Meagan Zentner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Burdette
19W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda White
32W–50L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Greene
10W–3L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Billips
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.