Teams

LB Houston/Tadal M3.5

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-11vs McKinney/Llambias-Fletcher M3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJonathan Jenkins / Tsvetoslav Tsvetkov vs JaeHun Jung / Taewoong Youn1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRobert Milbrand vs Kaiwei Chen6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNiraj Karki / James Tadal vs Patrick Skinner / Alvin Wong1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Jack Coleman TC/Ngo M3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesYaoqi Guo / Rushabh Tike vs Peter Nguyen / TOAN NGO6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTsvetoslav Tsvetkov / Satya Gade vs Anthony Bailey / Jaime Rodriguez4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-20vs The Lakes TA/Smith-Elliott M3.5Won 31
W#1 DoublesNiraj Karki / Rhett Scroggs vs Jeff McLeland / Steve Kelly7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesYaoqi Guo vs Jason Kavanaugh6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKyle Adam / Rushabh Tike vs William Leach / Clayton Gammill6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesVinay Ujjini / Luis Rodriguez vs Christopher Elliott / William Gareth Ricketts2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
James Tadal
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Arvind Sinha
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Kyle Adam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Niraj Karki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rhett Scroggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Milbrand
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rushabh Tike
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Sai Madhav Perumalla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Satya Gade
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tsvetoslav Tsvetkov
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Vinay Ujjini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yaoqi Guo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Satya Gade + Arvind Sinha5451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Tadal
13W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Arvind Sinha
17W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Kyle Adam
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Niraj Karki
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhett Scroggs
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Robert Milbrand
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rushabh Tike
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sai Madhav Perumalla
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Satya Gade
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tsvetoslav Tsvetkov
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vinay Ujjini
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yaoqi Guo
15W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.