Teams

Kohler: Sets in the City

2025 ADULT 65 & OVER SUMMER · 6.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-24vs ThiesLost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy Ahlm / Elizabeth LaVigne vs Barbara Little / Debra Tresidder1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Rousseau / Meg Sundby vs Laura Maki / Maureen Wollak1-6, 3-6
2025-07-17vs Faint-ShippersLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Berner / Elizabeth LaVigne vs Jane Davidson / Bonnie Niles1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJill Kohler / Meg Sundby vs Elisa Wright / Dyanne Kerr6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnette Kuck / Laura Owen vs Deborah Atterberry / Kathleen Tillotson6-7, 6-7
2025-06-19vs Faint-ShippersLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Kohler / Ellen Berner vs Jane Davidson / Bonnie Niles6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Owen / Meg Sundby vs Dyanne Kerr / Sue Ensign6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Oconnell / Linda Rousseau vs Kathleen Tillotson / Marjorie Champlin1-6, 1-6
2025-06-12vs ThiesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEllen Berner / Nancy Mellin vs Cindy Harriage / Laura Maki6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Kohler / Wendy Bloom vs Maureen Wollak / Joan Woodford7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-05vs Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Kohler / Elizabeth LaVigne vs Elizabeth Anderson / Eileen Stanley6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Mellin / Lela Porter vs Kathleen Miller / Julie Weaver6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Sundby / Judith Oconnell vs Brenda Jewell / Laura Sheak6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-29vs Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Berner / Elizabeth LaVigne vs Deb Holmgren / Elizabeth Anderson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Owen / Cindy Ahlm vs Patricia Fettes / Anita Goulett3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeg Sundby / Linda Rousseau vs Jacqueline Buhl / Brenda Jewell2-6, 3-6
2025-05-22vs ThiesWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllen Berner / Elizabeth LaVigne vs Laura Maki / Sherri Nichols6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Mellin / Wendy Bloom vs Maureen Wollak / Joan Woodford4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCindy Ahlm / Laura Owen vs Joan Gustafson / Karen Carr6-4, 6-0
2025-05-15vs Faint-ShippersWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllen Berner / Elizabeth LaVigne vs Bonnie Niles / Linda Burns7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWendy Bloom / Nancy Mellin vs Sandy Henk / Marilyn Kelley6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCindy Ahlm / Annette Kuck vs Deborah Atterberry / Elisa Wright3-6, 4-6
2025-05-08vs Faint-ShippersLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Bloom / Jill Kohler vs Bonnie Niles / Linda Burns4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Owen / Judith Oconnell vs Sue Ensign / Sandy Henk6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLela Porter / Nancy Mellin vs Deborah Atterberry / Judy Gower7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Laura Owen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Elizabeth LaVigne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Jill Kohler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Cindy Ahlm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ellen Berner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Annette Kuck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Judith Oconnell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lela Porter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Meg Sundby
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Nancy Mellin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Wendy Bloom
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Owen + Jill Kohler3252% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Berner + Elizabeth LaVigne224 matchesnot enough data
Jill Kohler + Wendy Bloom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Owen
7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
3
Elizabeth LaVigne
10W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Jill Kohler
9W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cindy Ahlm
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ellen Berner
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Annette Kuck
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Judith Oconnell
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lela Porter
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meg Sundby
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Mellin
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Bloom
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.