Teams

Su.Potter18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-05vs La.Kane18C5.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Proctor / Kelly Baltzer vs Sabrina Kane / Emilie Moses3-6, 1-6
2025-09-28vs Sa.Highsmith18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Thompson / Laurie Holderness vs Bess Pitt / Sally Highsmith2-6, 0-6
2025-09-17vs Sa.Copley18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Baltzer / Stephanie Bradley vs Shelley Truman / Sarah Copley6-3, 7-6
2025-09-07vs Je.VanCampen18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesHolly Eaddy / Kelly Baltzer vs Erin Hemminger / Anne Newton4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-08-24vs Pa.Spell18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Kelly Thompson vs Donna Driscoll / Lorna Hirsch6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-17vs Je.Tyndall18C5.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Kristin Upchurch vs Shobha Vagianos / Kelly Nels5-7, 2-6
2025-08-10vs St.Gupton18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesHolly Eaddy / Kelly Baltzer vs Allison Gupton / Elizabeth Schacht7-5, 6-1
2025-08-03vs Sa.Forman18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Eaddy / Kelly Baltzer vs Erica Coln / Allison Shipe3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Stephanie Bradley
published
2.81
Lisa McDermott
published
2.80
Beth Farrell
published 3
2.74
Kristin Upchurch
published
2.70
Laurie Holderness
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Monica Gardner
published
2.62
Kristen Rauth
published
2.62
Holly Eaddy
published
2.51
Kelly Baltzer
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.18
Jillian McDermott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa McDermott + Monica Gardner213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa McDermott + Beth Farrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Bradley
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Lisa McDermott
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Beth Farrell
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Kristin Upchurch
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Laurie Holderness
78W–107L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Monica Gardner
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Kristen Rauth
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Holly Eaddy
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62
2.5
Kelly Baltzer
35W–39L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Jillian McDermott
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.