Teams

PIPER PK 18AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Maggie Oros
published
3.79
Hanae Stansvik
published 4
3.74
Hikari Tamura
published 4
3.69
Nadine Johnson
published
3.62
Rebecca Skoloff
published
3.61
Lara McDermott
published
3.60
Sharon Klein
published
3.56
Lucia Wallace
published
3.54
Meghan Caldwell
published
3.52
Shannon Rajewski
published
3.47
Jessica Kaludis
published
3.40
Anne-marie Tasto
published 4
3.37
Patricia Sheedy
published
Marni Phippen
published
Sarah Barron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Rajewski + Hikari Tamura3266% gamesnot enough data
Hanae Stansvik + Shannon Rajewski224 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Kaludis + Rebecca Skoloff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Oros
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Hanae Stansvik
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Hikari Tamura
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Nadine Johnson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Rebecca Skoloff
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Lara McDermott
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Sharon Klein
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lucia Wallace
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Meghan Caldwell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.54
Shannon Rajewski
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Jessica Kaludis
18W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
4
Anne-marie Tasto
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.40
Patricia Sheedy
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Marni Phippen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Barron
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.