Teams

Biondolillo-Ramos/Chattanooga

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Chattanooga · 4.0 men

7 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-27vs Curtis/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesHarold Kincaid / Jim Sabourin vs Dwight Hilley / Kyle Christensen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Biondolillo / Kelvin Thomas vs Hiroshi Aoki / Chris Curtis2-6, 4-6
2025-04-06vs Curtis/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesRommel Ramos / Scott Higgins vs Charles Kerr / Peter Lund2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJim Sabourin / Kelvin Thomas vs David Cobb / Chris Curtis2-6, 4-6
2025-03-30vs Curtis/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesRommel Ramos / Jim Sabourin vs Michael Hoops / David Cobb2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Higgins / Harold Kincaid vs Chris Curtis / Peter Lund4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelvin Thomas / John Biondolillo vs Dwight Hilley / Charles Kerr7-5, 6-0
2025-03-16vs Curtis/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJim Sabourin / Kelvin Thomas vs Hiroshi Aoki / Peter Lund2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesScott Higgins / Harold Kincaid vs David Cobb / Michael Hoops5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRommel Ramos / Reggie Vachon vs Kyle Christensen / Dwight Hilley2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Rommel Ramos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Reggie Vachon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
John Biondolillo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Scott Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Harold Kincaid
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Sabourin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kelvin Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rommel Ramos + Reggie Vachon033 matchesnot enough data
Kelvin Thomas + John Biondolillo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rommel Ramos
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Reggie Vachon
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
John Biondolillo
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Scott Higgins
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Harold Kincaid
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Sabourin
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelvin Thomas
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.