Teams

Catt/40/3.0/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.10 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darren Lavarine
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.87
JP Love
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
ADAM BIENVENU
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Chandler Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.53
Dink McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3
Jason Cancienne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jason Catt
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Jason Ortis
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Jay St. Romain
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Joseph Kanode
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Mark Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Ronnie Matherne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Travis Motichek
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Wayne LaCombe
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronnie Matherne + Mark Maloney044 matchesnot enough data
JP Love + Travis Motichek123 matchesnot enough data
Dink McCoy + Ronnie Matherne033 matchesnot enough data
Jason Ortis + Wayne LaCombe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darren Lavarine
6W–2L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
JP Love
16W–10L career · 17 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
ADAM BIENVENU
6W–3L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chandler Edwards
2W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dink McCoy
9W–28L career · 18 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
Jason Cancienne
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Catt
38W–17L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Ortis
16W–34L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay St. Romain
14W–3L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Kanode
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Lucas
17W–12L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Maloney
6W–27L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronnie Matherne
11W–31L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Motichek
17W–29L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne LaCombe
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.