Teams

KY/LOU/STIVERS/MARSH

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & Over LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 2.93 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-06vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLDLost 05
L#1 DoublesKim DeVries / Lihui Bai vs Taylor Bockweg / Terri Ann Nicholls6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Bagley vs Graham Pilotte1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna Gordinier / Karen Quinkert vs Jillian Brooks / Deanna Durrett2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesIulia Brockman vs Kelley Roberts1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLea Marsh / Robin Krawiec vs Maria Hawkins / Rachel Lacap6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-01vs KY/LOU/WHITE/FRALICKWon 41
W#1 DoublesKim DeVries / Lihui Bai vs Jackie Fralick / Shannon Elder6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDawn McCubbin vs Lilly Massa-McKinley3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLea Marsh / Robin Krawiec vs Danielle Dattilo / Nadine McQueenie6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesIulia Brockman vs Lori Caloia6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIrina McGrath / Kim Ford vs Emma Breetz / Pamela Royster6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-22vs KY/LOU/TAYLOR/BAILEYWon 32
W#1 DoublesLihui Bai / Margy Stivers vs Emily Rives / Jennifer Schulz6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesIulia Brockman vs Kristina Quigley7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeanna Gordinier / Karen Quinkert vs Molly Blacketer / Annie Beanblossom6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEllen Eiler vs Kelsey Norcia2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKim DeVries / Robin Krawiec vs Holly Gravely / Kate Son6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-21vs KY/LOU/HALE/KAMPSCHAEFERWon 32
W#1 DoublesKaren Quinkert / Paula Edwards vs Laila Felli / Kathryn Ball6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEllen Eiler vs Laura Neely0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Malone / Deanna Gordinier vs Leslie Kampschaefer / Sara Stevens6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesIulia Brockman vs Sarah Height6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTaylor Gehring / Holly Bagley vs Tammy Hale / Elisa Kaufman4-6, 5-7
2026-02-07vs KY/LOU/WHITMER/FRAZIERLost 13
L#1 DoublesKim DeVries / Lea Marsh vs Nicole Boehm / Laura Ochsner2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Bagley vs Jessica Whitmer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Eiler / Karen Quinkert vs Anjali Ajmani / Kristan Bryant4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTaylor Gehring / Robin Krawiec vs Julie Eckert / Meghan Myron6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-01vs KY/LOU/WINEBRENNER/KELLERMANLost 05
L#1 DoublesMargy Stivers / Lihui Bai vs Meg Coomes / Elizabeth Austin4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesIulia Brockman vs Caroline Elliott0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLea Marsh / Paula Edwards vs MARY CECIL / Kim Riley2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAlison Malone vs Shari Stewart3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKim Ford / Dawn McCubbin vs Stephanie Kellerman / Sophie Cattermole1-6, 2-6
2026-01-18vs KY/LOU/WOOCK/BARGERWon 21
W#2 DoublesMargy Stivers / Paula Edwards vs Leah Nolan / Leslie Pike6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHolly Bagley vs Stephanie Kaebnick0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLihui Bai / Kim DeVries vs Lacey Jurgens / Lauren Schmitt6-4, 6-1
2026-01-10vs KY/LOU/WILLIAMS/JONESLost 14
L#1 DoublesNancy Jones / Margy Stivers vs Elizabeth Williams / Eden Hottell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesIulia Brockman vs Emily Irwin0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Quinkert / Paula Edwards vs Mallory Strange / Betsy Pfeiffer3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKim DeVries vs Katie Archer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobin Krawiec / Linnette Hodges vs Nicole Jones-Latka / Allison Morris0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/MEAGHER / SCHARF62281229287
2KY/LOU/SUN/SCHNURR62271330293
3KY/LOU/WINEBRENNER/KELLERMAN62261431297
4KY/LOU/OUTLAW/HOLLAND53261436309
5KY/LOU/STIVERS/MARSH44152553382
6KY/LOU/WHITE/FRALICK35152551362
7KY/LOU/HALE/KAMPSCHAEFER26142658410
8KY/LOU/TAYLOR/BAILEY17132758405
9KY/LOU/WOOCK/BARGER17122858408
10KY/LOU/MILLIGAN/CHESSLER1793163418
11KY/LOU/SCARBROUGH0893164417

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Paula Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Deanna Gordinier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Lihui Bai
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Karen Quinkert
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Kim DeVries
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Irina McGrath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Iulia Brockman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.64
Margy Stivers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Ellen Eiler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.61
Alison Malone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.59
Dawn McCubbin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.55
Linnette Hodges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Lea Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.40
Robin Krawiec
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.35
Holly Bagley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.32
Kim Ford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor Gehring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lea Marsh + Robin Krawiec5843% games+4.8% vs expected
Margy Stivers + Lea Marsh5255% games−2.0% vs expected
Kim DeVries + Lea Marsh3643% games−4.9% vs expected
Kim DeVries + Robin Krawiec0735% games−15.0% vs expected
Margy Stivers + Kim DeVries134 matchesnot enough data
Lea Marsh + Paula Edwards134 matchesnot enough data
Paula Edwards + Deanna Gordinier314 matchesnot enough data
Deanna Gordinier + Karen Quinkert224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Edwards
34W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Deanna Gordinier
35W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Lihui Bai
13W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Karen Quinkert
18W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Kim DeVries
25W–41L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Irina McGrath
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Iulia Brockman
22W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Margy Stivers
36W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Ellen Eiler
0W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Alison Malone
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Dawn McCubbin
17W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Linnette Hodges
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Lea Marsh
22W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Robin Krawiec
11W–35L career · 8 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
2.5
Holly Bagley
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Kim Ford
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
Taylor Gehring
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.