Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Andreason

2021 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.0M

8 players · average NTRP 2.94 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-10-16vs Cottonwood Club-RuprechtSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrent Higgs / Chase Hauver vs Bryan DeHaan / Joel Littleford4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEndhi Visser / Sam Gomez vs Dan Murray / Tibor Kovacsovics7-6, 6-3
2021-10-09vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-BalchLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Keller / Endhi Visser vs John Leggett / Soheyl Tadjiki5-7, 2-6
2021-10-02vs Sports Mall-NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesEndhi Visser / Andrew Keller vs Lonny Pehrson / Ryan Farr1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrooks Andreason / Fernando Torres vs Ernie Costello / Jacob Jaskierny1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrent Higgs / Jeffrey West vs Darren Nelson / Brady Patrick1-6, 2-6
2021-09-20vs Sports Mall-BachmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrent Higgs / Jeffrey West vs Arasu Gopinath / Jeff Henderson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEndhi Visser / Andrew Keller vs Dean Bachman / David Rozsa6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrooks Andreason / CLARK BRIESACHER vs Randy Fox / Timothy Gribben6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-13vs Salt Lake Tennis-Riding/DagostiniLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooks Andreason / Brent Higgs vs Steven Martinez / Jeff Pettey5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLance Linscott / Adam Bohe vs Tam Vu / Alex Farley1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChase Hauver / Endhi Visser vs Matthew Heller / Aaron Eng-Tow0-6, 2-6
2021-08-28vs South Jordan-Galindo/KnaphusLost 01
L#3 DoublesEndhi Visser / Brent Higgs vs Tres Cary / Brian Sheets2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chase Hauver
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Fernando Torres
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Andrew Keller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Endhi Visser
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
CLARK BRIESACHER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Brent Higgs
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.33
Michael Fordham
published 2.5
Adam Bohe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Endhi Visser + Andrew Keller4647% games+4.6% vs expected
Endhi Visser + Michael Fordham113141% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chase Hauver
27W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Fernando Torres
98W–77L career · 1 line in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
3
Andrew Keller
40W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Endhi Visser
75W–119L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
CLARK BRIESACHER
26W–18L career · 1 line in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Brent Higgs
31W–116L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Michael Fordham
20W–64L career · no lines in 2021
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Adam Bohe
4W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.