Teams

3BRC-SCOTT 3.0 women win singles SEM F2

2025 aSEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2025 WOMEN 3.0 WINTER SINGLES SEM

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesDianna Guglielmetti vs Tiffany Harris6-3, 4-3
W#2 SinglesKaterina Golbiw vs Brannon Alexander6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesChristine Scott vs Cara Bozyk6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAffaf Arabbo vs Elizabeth Simpson1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Newcombe vs Stephane Lubin3-6, 5-3
W#3 SinglesChristine Scott vs Alyce Howarth6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaterina Golbiw vs Nora Beevers2-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Wize vs Annie Bakken1-6, 3-2
W#3 SinglesAffaf Arabbo vs Susana Soler Miquel6-4, 1-2
L#1 SinglesDianna Guglielmetti vs Sherry Du7-5, 0-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChristine Scott vs Yasuko Tagawa1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJennifer Newcombe vs Laura Borovsky4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKaterina Golbiw vs Tiffany Harris6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesCatherine Topf vs Elizabeth Tschannen2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDianna Guglielmetti vs Elizabeth Simpson3-6, 4-2
W#2 SinglesKaterina Golbiw vs Faith Gaudaen2-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCatherine Topf vs Shannon O'Brien6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaterina Golbiw vs Danielle Edwards6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Newcombe vs Donna Peres3-6, 6-2
L#3 SinglesChristine Scott vs Terri Griffin0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Newcombe vs Sherry Du1-6, 3-5
L#2 SinglesChristine Scott vs Konomi Aino3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAffaf Arabbo vs Kurumi Yamada6-4, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 WOMEN 3.0 WINTER SINGLES SEM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Katerina Golbiw
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.91
Dianna Guglielmetti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.90
Catherine Topf
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Affaf Arabbo
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Jennifer Newcombe
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.65
Christine Scott
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Emily Wize
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Scott + Catherine Topf123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katerina Golbiw
33W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3
Dianna Guglielmetti
15W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Catherine Topf
84W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Affaf Arabbo
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Newcombe
33W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Christine Scott
64W–144L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Emily Wize
16W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.