Teams

JCC/Hauser M3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-06vs Garland/Trinh-Ngo M3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJay Gibson / David Youngberg vs Vinh Chau / Jordan Odulio3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Gaunt vs Kevin Nguyen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Phillips / Scott Thresher vs Ryan Nguyen / Jimmy Pham3-6, 2-6
2024-10-27vs Stonebridge/Gatewood M3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Daitch / Jay Gibson vs Stephen Shapiro / Mazin Nakhleh6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTom Wilkie vs Michael Davidson0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBret Gerard / Bruce Aranoff vs Mathis Smith / Michael Wooten0-6, 2-6
2024-10-20vs L B Houston/Nader-Tadal M3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Youngberg / Benjamin Daitch vs Rhett Scroggs / Niraj Karki5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Galerston / Bret Gerard vs Arvind Sinha / Jonathan Jenkins1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Solis / David Kane vs Satya Gade / Alex Daly0-6, 2-6
2024-10-13vs SpringPark/S. Nolen M3.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesTom Wilkie vs Diego Perez Palacios1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Hudspeth / Michael Solis vs Jason Vorel / Thomas D'Amore0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Aranoff / Bret Gerard vs Dennis Wild / Chip Hodge6-3, 7-6
2024-10-06vs McKinney/Fletcher-Fylling M3.5Lost 13
W#1 DoublesAaron Hauser / Lane Wimberly vs Terrance Williams / Farhad Choudhury5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTom Wilkie vs Saket Raizada4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Daitch / Jeff Phillips vs Aaron Rucker / Ivan Goridkov2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Margolis / Scott Thresher vs Daniel Zambrana / Mark Farrell1-6, 1-6
2024-09-29vs Wagon Wheel/Oh-An M3.5Lost 04
L#1 DoublesAaron Hauser / Jay Gibson vs Hieu Nguyen / Kha Nguyen6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Hudspeth vs Manish Jangid0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMark Margolis / David Youngberg vs Lucas An / Mohammad Sangani6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBruce Aranoff / David Kane vs Sammy Souaiaia / Mike Lin2-6, 0-6
2024-09-22vs Canyon Creek/Red-Jost M3.5Lost 04
L#1 DoublesAaron Hauser / Lane Wimberly vs Ben Henke / Ruben Sandoval0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTom Wilkie vs Anthony Boyer0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Gaunt / David Youngberg vs Doug Hipskind / James Marshall3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Hudspeth / Scott Thresher vs Eric Beshires / Evan Pounds6-7, 2-6
2024-09-15vs DAC/Kirby-Grist M3.5Lost 04
L#1 DoublesAaron Hauser / Benjamin Daitch vs Scott Eisenberg / Carr Carothers3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesThomas Gaunt vs Sean McHose3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMark Margolis / Scott Thresher vs Patrick Kirby / Alejandro Martinez1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBret Gerard / Michael Solis vs David Goodhart / Russell Gayle1-6, 2-6
2024-09-08vs Bent Tree/Dugas-BoodeeM3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesJay Gibson / David Youngberg vs Paul Boodee / Darrel Susman6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLane Wimberly vs Andrew Graben1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Phillips / Scott Thresher vs Craig Smith / Harrison Crosby2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Hudspeth / David Kane vs Clifton Dugas / John Rasor0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings31 teams · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1North Texas Racquet Club/Llambias-Yu M3.510032823280
2High Point/Gardner M3.591261434306
3Lifetime Plano/Cox-Brown M3.58026614183
4Wagon Wheel/Oh-An M3.58024819234
5McKinney/Fletcher-Fylling M3.57125717189
6Gleneagles/Guibert-Mathews M3.571181433285
7Garland/Trinh-Ngo M3.57227924249
8DAC/Fellman-Littlefield M3.56224820220
9Greenhill/Johnson-Sipes M3.563241226281
10Canyon Creek/Red-Jost M3.563231330297
11L B Houston/Nader-Tadal M3.563221433301
12Lakes/Lightfoot M3.564202044346
13McKinney/SuriyanarayananM3.553201231264
14Huffhines/Yeoh-Solomon M3.555221839323
15Brookhaven/Cox M3.555241639310
16Lakes @ CH/Boronski M3.544171531277
17Chandlers Landing/Deere M3.544171533279
18DAC/Kirby-Grist M3.545171944341
19El Dorado/Leder M3.546221843338
20The Nelson/Puklicz M3.536181842332
21LB Houston/Gopinath-Khandelwal M3.536152148381
22Stonebridge/Gatewood M3.536112553360
23McKinney/Clifton M3.537152556404
24SpringPark/S. Nolen M3.527132353381
25Samuell Grand/Witt-Allen M3.52792754339
26Stonebriar/Dudley-Epperson M3.528122859407
27Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.528103066427
28Huffhines/Bell-Yeoh M3.51752755338
29Bent Tree/Dugas-BoodeeM3.51892757374
30Wilkerson Sanders/Powell-Nuytten M3.50842858361
31JCC/Hauser M3.5S0953164406

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Daitch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Tom Wilkie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.10
David Youngberg
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
John Hudspeth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Bruce Aranoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bret Gerard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jay Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lane Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Mark Margolis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Solis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Thresher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Thomas Gaunt
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
William Galerston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Zachary Tobolowsky
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Youngberg + Jay Gibson3349% gamesnot enough data
David Youngberg + William Galerston404 matchesnot enough data
Mark Margolis + David Youngberg033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Margolis + Scott Thresher033 matchesnot enough data
David Youngberg + Benjamin Daitch123 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Daitch + Jay Gibson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benjamin Daitch
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Wilkie
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.22
3.5
David Youngberg
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
John Hudspeth
0W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Bruce Aranoff
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Bret Gerard
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Gibson
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lane Wimberly
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Margolis
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Solis
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Thresher
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Gaunt
0W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Galerston
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Tobolowsky
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.