Teams

NWO 18&Over 2.5W DAY Coats/Gentry-U of Findlay

2026 NWO Adult 18 & Over Women Day · NWO Adult 18 & Over 2.5 W. Day

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Coats / Angela Gentry vs Michelle Walker / Jessica Bair6-2, 6-0
2026-07-14vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Stacy-BedfordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Kirk / Rachel Pape vs Maria Zapp / Natalia Zamkov4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Margliotti / Angela Gentry vs Bernadine Rais / Courtney Terteling6-3, 7-5
2026-06-30vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Day Morgan -SCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Kirk / Aimee Kearns vs Holly Morgan / Michelle Walker6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAngela Gentry vs Lisa Kemper6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Rafferty / Shelley Bishop vs Marty Zbierajewski / Madeline Nixon6-0, 6-0
2026-06-23vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Stacy-BedfordWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Coats / Angela Gentry vs Natalia Zamkov / Alina Abramenko6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Kirk / Amanda Margliotti vs Sara Stacy / Sue Mikkonen2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-09vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Day Morgan -SCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Kirk / Amanda Margliotti vs Holly Morgan / Lisa Kemper6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAngela Gentry vs Michelle Walker6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Kinsel-evans / Aimee Kearns vs Brooke Treloar / Madeline Nixon6-2, 6-3
2026-06-02vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Stacy-BedfordWon 20
W#1 DoublesAimee Kearns / Amanda Margliotti vs Sara Stacy / Courtney Terteling6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarcia Poling / Shelley Bishop vs Rachel Root / Natalia Zamkov6-3, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NWO Adult 18 & Over 2.5 W. Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 18&Over 2.5W DAY Coats/Gentry-U of Findlay51153889
2NWO 18&Over 2.5W Stacy-Bedford4212613116
3NWO 18&Over 2.5W Day Morgan -SCC0601836217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Angela Gentry
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.45
Aimee Kearns
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Diana Kirk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Christine Tulley
published 2.5
2.23
Amanda Margliotti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.22
Shelley Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Marcia Poling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Kinsel-evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yumi Nishimura
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Kirk + Angela Gentry1434% gamesnot enough data
Angela Gentry + Amanda Margliotti123 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Margliotti + Yumi Nishimura033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Angela Gentry
32W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
2.5
Aimee Kearns
7W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Diana Kirk
7W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Christine Tulley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Margliotti
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Shelley Bishop
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Marcia Poling
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Heather Kinsel-evans
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yumi Nishimura
3W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.