Teams

KJohnson/JPaez (Jeff Adams)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-16vs IFuster (Veterans)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBharath Bhaskar / Alec Johnson vs JACK TCHIRKOW / Will Foster6-2, 7-6
2024-05-09vs JRitter (Weddington)Won 20
W#2 DoublesShaun Sikes / Steven Sala vs Rishi Kapur / Randy Barrett6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBharath Bhaskar / Marc Parker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-02vs JIngram (Veterans)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesShaun Sikes vs Warren Stanton4-6, 3-6
2024-04-25vs DDemaine/AGiardina (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJose Paez / Bharath Bhaskar vs Devon DeMaine / Grant Carney6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesShaun Sikes vs Ryan Poage6-4, 6-3
2024-04-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesShaun Sikes vs Keith Kasler3-6, 4-6
2024-04-11Won 10
W#2 SinglesShaun Sikes vs Giacomo Arnaboldi6-1, 6-4
2024-04-04vs MAlexander (Mason Wallace)Won 20
W#2 SinglesShaun Sikes vs Benjamin Shamanis7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBharath Bhaskar / Phibes Vogel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-21vs RGogate/BStover (Blakeney)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBharath Bhaskar / Richard Schanzlin vs Jed Levitas / Bradford Hood6-2, 7-5
2024-02-29vs RAllen/RSankaran (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBharath Bhaskar / Jose Paez vs Koji Krzywosz / Rajesh Sankaran6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesShaun Sikes vs Toshio Asano6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Bharath Bhaskar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Shaun Sikes
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.77
Richard Schanzlin
published
3.76
Michael Maio
published
3.69
Alec Johnson
published 4
3.58
Brandon Thio
published 4
3.54
Konstantin Archakov
published
Marc Parker
published
Phibes Vogel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alec Johnson + Michael Maio224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bharath Bhaskar
149W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Shaun Sikes
66W–51L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
Richard Schanzlin
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Michael Maio
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Alec Johnson
11W–25L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Brandon Thio
23W–49L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Konstantin Archakov
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Marc Parker
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Phibes Vogel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.