Teams

CDTA W 18&OW3.0 6.MT Pal Snyder Sat 2 $26

CDTA Winter 18 & Over W · E

16 players · average NTRP 2.94 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesCatherine Lange / Sharon Snyder vs Jessica Coffin / Shelly Costabile6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Niro / Beth Zawilenski vs Amy Shappert / Pam Cohen6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesSharon Snyder / Catherine Lange vs Teresa Simchak / Lisa Fitzgibbon6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKristin Lordahl vs Lisa Levy6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelleen Thut / Pamela Niro vs Lori Lamey / Sherri Wolff6-7, 2-5
L#1 DoublesHolly Cooper-Belconis / Catherine Lange vs Cindi Papas / Gina Borkowski4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelleen Thut / Kristin Lordahl vs Sydney Golde / Maria Unwala5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Niro / Laurie Pereira vs Cathy Silvis / Nayna Patel1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Snyder / Catherine Lange vs Amanda Marijanovic / Jean Niemi6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTara Snow / Bonnie Kipperman vs Kim Vandegrift / Margaret Keane3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCherrie Han / Kristin Lordahl vs Angie Rush / Modupe Sobo1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesCatherine Lange / Anne Lewis vs Jess McKune / Nikki Veen3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Cooper-Belconis / Vanessa Harris vs Lindsay Miller / Molly Klein Catalano7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTara Snow / Bonnie Kipperman vs Kelli Brinkman / Nora Jewett0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTanja Vukasin / Miriam Wozniewski vs Diana Atad / Simone Brown1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Lange / Beth Zawilenski vs Julie Gordon / Jessica Coffin3-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesKelleen Thut / Miriam Wozniewski vs Sheila Henretta / Katie Sullivan5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Lewis / Catherine Lange vs Frances Hopps / Patty Ohle6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHolly Cooper-Belconis / Kelleen Thut vs Allison Cohen / Laurie Woolverton6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 18&OW3.0 7.Centennial Tromp Sun 7 $2072241233283
2CDTA W 18&OW3.0 2.MT Chi Brown Sun 2 $31.572211533275
3CDTA W 18&OW3.0 3.Lake Bluff Sherman Sun 6 $2254181839303
4CDTA W 18&OW3.0 4.Tam Wolff Sun 3 $2254201640325
5CDTA W 18&OW3.0 8.LifeSport Kiernan Sun 1 $2545201633257
6CDTA W 18&OW3.0 5.Centennial Cohen Sun 3 $2045142247357
7CDTA W 18&OW3.0 1.MT Bann Gordon Sun 12 $2736152144336
8CDTA W 18&OW3.0 6.MT Pal Snyder Sat 2 $2618122450355

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Sharon Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
3.07
3.04
Anne Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.93
Catherine Lange
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.90
Beth Zawilenski
published 3
2.84
Kristin Lordahl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Tara Snow
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.80
Cherrie Han
published 3
2.76
Kelleen Thut
published 3
Holly Cooper-Belconis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Vanessa Harris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Pamela Niro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Bonnie Kipperman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Laurie Pereira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Miriam Wozniewski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tanja Vukasin
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherrie Han + Catherine Lange11452% games+14.7% vs expected
Jacqueline Lakely + Tara Snow11760% games+13.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Lakely + Sharon Snyder181454% games+11.1% vs expected
Sharon Snyder + Anne Lewis5153% games+6.5% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Beth Zawilenski4651% games+4.5% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Jacqueline Lakely5646% games+1.6% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Tara Snow2641% games+0.3% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Sharon Snyder13755% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Snyder
97W–93L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.19
3
Jacqueline Lakely
57W–54L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Anne Lewis
65W–94L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Catherine Lange
80W–61L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Beth Zawilenski
28W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Kristin Lordahl
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Tara Snow
33W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Cherrie Han
74W–97L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kelleen Thut
65W–104L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Holly Cooper-Belconis
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Harris
22W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Pamela Niro
24W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Bonnie Kipperman
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Pereira
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Miriam Wozniewski
39W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanja Vukasin
6W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.